Demographics of inceldom: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 575: Line 575:


===China===
===China===
China (as well as India) have some of the largest surplus of males and hence a huge number of male incels which is thought to even aggravate in the coming decades and is thought to become a substantial threat to social stability.<ref>https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/2142658/too-many-men-china-and-india-battle-consequences</ref> There are now an excess of 70 million males in China and India.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#There_are_now_70_million_excess_men_in_China_and_India_who_will_live_and_die_without_partners</ref> The Washington Post produced an article with impressive visualizations of the problem.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-many-men/</ref>
 
China (as well as India) have some of the largest surplus of males and hence a huge number of male incels which is thought to even aggravate in the coming decades and is thought to become a substantial threat to social stability.<ref>https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/2142658/too-many-men-china-and-india-battle-consequences</ref> There are now an excess of 70 million males in China and India.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#There_are_now_70_million_excess_men_in_China_and_India_who_will_live_and_die_without_partners</ref> The Washington Post produced an article with impressive visualizations of the problem.<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-many-men/</ref> Chinese academics have more strictly enforced marriage compared to a Greek academic sample and seemingly fewer incels (those in the category "single-difficult to attract a partner", see table on the right), though marriage norms have also become laxer since the liberalization following the 1990s economic boom. These data suggest that marriage norms have a strong impact on mitigating inceldom.
 
{| class="wikitable" id="usvschina"
|+Marital Status Across Different Age Groups (%)<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704919887706</ref>
|-
!colspan="1"|
!colspan="4"|Greek sample
!colspan="4"|Chinese sample
|-
!Marital Status
!18–24
!25–31
!32–38
!39<
!18–24
!25–31
!32–38
!39<
|-
!Single-difficult to attract a partner
|27
|28.5
|25.7
|23.5
|26.4
|15.6
|3.9
|0.8
|-
!Single-between relationships
|12.4
|18.4
|21.6
|17.7
|9.8
|8.1
|6.8
|4.2
|-
!Single-prefer to be single
|13.8
|10.8
|8.1
|7.3
|35
|21.5
|3.9
|4.2
|-
!In a relationship
|45.1
|35.4
|21.6
|15.8
|28.1
|31.6
|1.9
|4.2
|-
!Married
|0.9
|7
|23
|35.8
|0.7
|23.1
|83.5
|86.4
|}


===Denmark===
===Denmark===
17,538

edits

Navigation menu