Women: Difference between revisions

Women are more prone than men to have an opposition to the live-and-let-live attitude. Whereas men have more of a tendency to espouse a "you do you" attitude on matters related to sex, women on average are not so open-minded, even if they wish the same exact courtesy to be extended to themselves. A great example of an avenue where you can witness such a female attitude is their reaction to [[sexbot]]s or fleshlights. Polls that eschew opposition to the iea, and organizations that oppose the idea heavily skew female. The arguments in opposition to sexbots and fleshlights usually hinge on arguments related to "thats objectification of women" or "you are promoting the idea of women not having any agency". But when you look at these arguments criticaly, what they're really saying is that men should abandon allosexuality in favor of demisexuality.

In other words, these female arguments are an indirect way of saying that they wished men became emasculated to follow a feminine form of sexuality in favor of a male form of sexuality. Although it is true that some men are inherently demisexual, thats not the case for all men. Demisexuality is a sentiment far more entrenched in female nature than male nature. Yet these same feminists/women wish to convince us that western society does not emasculate men? Men absolutely are being emasculated in western society if traits inherent to male biology are being discarded in favor of an female manner of looking at sexuality. Evidence that demisexuality is more of a feminine trait than a masculine trait can be found in the [[Libido#Aromantic_allosexuality_vs_demisexuality|aromantic allosexuality vs demisexuality]] section.

For [[malecel]] [[truecel]]s, the primary perception of a female is that of a [[sexual gatekeeper]]. Statistics show that female rate an incredible 80% of men as unattractive.<ref>https://archive.is/ZJymw</ref> As law enforcement increasingly favors females, females have begun using [[ravishoax]]es (false rape accusations) as a trump card when in a dispute with a man. False rape accusations even happen in cases completely unrelated to dating or sex. For example there have been cases of female ravishoaxing even when the interaction was absolutely mundane, involving a mere exchange of pleasantries. The reason femalse can get away with incessant FRA (false rape accusation) is that the latter isn't viewed as evil as the former. Society finds it useful as well because it can neutralize the male natural advantage of physical strength, thereby, making females as, or in the case of particularly cunning female, more powerful than males in public life. Why is modern society apathetic to such injustice? Its in the name of "gender equality". Its an attempt to abrogate the natural difference in male-to-female muscle mass. You can't abrogate the difference in male-to-female body mass naturally, nor via medicine, no matter how many steroids you could hypothetically and systematically pump into female; as such, you must do it via the legal system. female HAVE to be given legal prerogatives in order to emancipate themselves from the inequity of estrogen vis-a-vis testosterone. But how could that possibly be done? How could you possibly reverse millions of years of Darwinian physical adaptations that bifurcate from agamogony that eventually produced the difference in strength between the gentle sex (i.e. the female) and the sterner sex (i.e. the man)? Its by producing that all-encompassing trump card; that threat that says "hey, if you don't do as I say, I will tell others that you raped me". The modern woman, well aware of the terrifying nature of producing such a trump card, always keeps one near at hand and easily accessible. One on the buttoned-flap on her blouse, another in the zipper in her purse, and another on the patch-pocket on the buttocks of her trousers. Although there has been minimal studies on false rape accusations, there have been exactly ZERO studies on false rape accusation ''threats''. Whereas in the former scenario, the woman is adament that her false exhortations are true, in the latter scenario, the woman admits that she's being fraudulent, but is comfortable enough that she won't face repercussions for making such a false accusation, thereby can manipulate men into following her orders.