Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  7 May 2021
(→‎Criticism: come on)
Line 146: Line 146:
</li><li>
</li><li>
<p>'''Traditionalism does not necessarily eliminate inceldom''': In the 19th century U.S., even though divorces were rare and traditional gender roles were strict, around 70% of men below age 25 were unmarried.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002115/</ref>
<p>'''Traditionalism does not necessarily eliminate inceldom''': In the 19th century U.S., even though divorces were rare and traditional gender roles were strict, around 70% of men below age 25 were unmarried.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3002115/</ref>
In Medieval patriarchy about 20% of the population was poor or destitute, preventing them from entering marriage contracts set by the male Lords.<ref>http://www.vlib.us/medieval/lectures/paupers.html</ref> There also seems to be no correlation between how relatively rigid gender roles are and how sexually dissatisfied a modern country is.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228641949_A_Global_Survey_of_Sexual_Behaviours table 4</ref> For example, Japan is the least sexually dissatisfied nation, but it has relatively rigid gender roles<ref>https://hir.harvard.edu/gender-gap-marriage-and-birthrate-in-japan/</ref> for a developed country.
In Medieval population about 20% of the population was poor or destitute, preventing them from entering marriage contracts set by the male Lords.<ref>http://www.vlib.us/medieval/lectures/paupers.html</ref> There also seems to be no correlation between how relatively rigid gender roles are and how sexually dissatisfied a modern country is.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228641949_A_Global_Survey_of_Sexual_Behaviours table 4</ref> For example, Japan is the least sexually dissatisfied nation, but it has relatively rigid gender roles<ref>https://hir.harvard.edu/gender-gap-marriage-and-birthrate-in-japan/</ref> for a developed country.
<!--Too wordy, complicated, hard-to-read, or not coherent vis-a-vis section header... Many millennial Japanese women are in the workforce, and there is a large male failure-to-meet societal gender roles, leaving the men without a future approved by Japanese society.
<!--Too wordy, complicated, hard-to-read, or not coherent vis-a-vis section header... Many millennial Japanese women are in the workforce, and there is a large male failure-to-meet societal gender roles, leaving the men without a future approved by Japanese society.
The Japanese government has invested at least 30 million dollars annually<ref>https://www.globaldatinginsights.com/news/japanese-government-is-set-to-pay-30m-into-dating-industry/</ref> into arranging monogamous relationships through arranged parties for young people<ref>https://www.sbs.com.au/guide/article/2018/09/25/japanese-government-sponsoring-parties-get-young-people-hooking</ref>, government-controlled online matchmaking services,<ref>https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/10/03/japans-state-owned-version-of-tinder</ref> and government arranged "marriage-hunting" events<ref>https://money.cnn.com/2016/09/21/news/economy/japan-government-dating-services/index.html</ref> to little success.  They have recently invested 18 billion dollars into childcare subsidies to spark fertility rates during 2017.  One successful venture in the Japanese town of Nagicho that increased fertility rates were giving new Moms $2,785 in cash and giving the citizens numerous special welfare benefits.<ref>https://qz.com/1646740/japan-wants-to-raise-its-fertility-rate-with-new-perks/</ref>  This shows that monogamous marriage may need to be extremely financially subsidized by the government rather than relying on gender roles in highly technological countries if the country does not want to engage in universal [[forced marriage]]. Japan's gender inequality index (which measures life expectancy and labor/school outcomes, not cultural gender roles) is lower to that of the U.S. (0.099 vs 0.182).<ref>http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/JPN</ref><ref>http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/USA</ref> -->  
The Japanese government has invested at least 30 million dollars annually<ref>https://www.globaldatinginsights.com/news/japanese-government-is-set-to-pay-30m-into-dating-industry/</ref> into arranging monogamous relationships through arranged parties for young people<ref>https://www.sbs.com.au/guide/article/2018/09/25/japanese-government-sponsoring-parties-get-young-people-hooking</ref>, government-controlled online matchmaking services,<ref>https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/10/03/japans-state-owned-version-of-tinder</ref> and government arranged "marriage-hunting" events<ref>https://money.cnn.com/2016/09/21/news/economy/japan-government-dating-services/index.html</ref> to little success.  They have recently invested 18 billion dollars into childcare subsidies to spark fertility rates during 2017.  One successful venture in the Japanese town of Nagicho that increased fertility rates were giving new Moms $2,785 in cash and giving the citizens numerous special welfare benefits.<ref>https://qz.com/1646740/japan-wants-to-raise-its-fertility-rate-with-new-perks/</ref>  This shows that monogamous marriage may need to be extremely financially subsidized by the government rather than relying on gender roles in highly technological countries if the country does not want to engage in universal [[forced marriage]]. Japan's gender inequality index (which measures life expectancy and labor/school outcomes, not cultural gender roles) is lower to that of the U.S. (0.099 vs 0.182).<ref>http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/JPN</ref><ref>http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/USA</ref> -->  
17,538

edits

Navigation menu