Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Roy Baumeister: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Blackpill conflict
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# The gender difference in physical strength and (political) power may have selected female sexuality to be flexible so as to accommodate to the men, though he leaves open whether it is the greater overall conformity in women being instantiated in sexual conformity or vice-versa. | # The gender difference in physical strength and (political) power may have selected female sexuality to be flexible so as to accommodate to the men, though he leaves open whether it is the greater overall conformity in women being instantiated in sexual conformity or vice-versa. | ||
# A weaker sex drive may imply a greater plasticity, whereas strong and powerful drives are less prone to socializing and civilizing influences. | # A weaker sex drive may imply a greater plasticity, whereas strong and powerful drives are less prone to socializing and civilizing influences. | ||
# Over the course of [[courtship]], women spontaneously switch from a coy deferral of sex to admitting of it. This may require a general readiness to change, which | # Over the course of [[courtship]], women spontaneously switch from a coy deferral of sex to admitting of it. This may require a general readiness to change, which may also give rise to a greater plasticity. | ||
Different from Baumeister's interpretation, and more aligned with the [[blackpill]], this line of research can also be understood to imply that women are highly compatible with [[monogamy|enforced monogamy]] and [[arranged marriage]], but it also suggests female coyness is not necessarily choosiness which does contradict some assumptions held in the blackpillosphere. | |||
==Personal life== | ==Personal life== | ||