Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:IQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Too technical? == | == Too technical? == | ||
Good additions & corrections, Alt, but I was just realizing that the lede is currently even more technical than [[wikipedia:Intelligence quotient]]. | |||
The few readers who know the terms "measuring the same factor", "measurement invariance", "factor analysis" likely mostly already know what IQ and g is, so the lede seems informative very few people. One can explain q and IQ in simple terms (test results vs a measure of ability to perform well on ''any'' IQ test and any real-world cognitive task). [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 07:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | The few readers who know the terms "measuring the same factor", "measurement invariance", "factor analysis" likely mostly already know what IQ and g is, so the lede seems informative to very few people. One can explain q and IQ in simple terms (test results vs a measure of ability to perform well on ''any'' IQ test and any real-world cognitive task). [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 07:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Norming == | == Norming == | ||
The explanation for the norming is confusing because the percentile is a different quantity than the score on a 100/15 normal distribution (even though one can convert from one to the other). [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 07:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | The explanation for the norming is confusing because the percentile is a different quantity than the score on a 100/15 normal distribution (even though one can convert from one to the other). [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 07:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC) | ||