Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Criticism
(→Themes) |
|||
| Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
<ul><li> | <ul><li> | ||
'''Too much focus on looks''': Correlations between looks, height, income, masculinity and partner count are only weak,<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704915604563</ref><ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2011.587758</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Across_91_studies.2C_bodily_masculinity_was_predictive_of_men.27s_mating_and_reproductive_success</ref> so looks are unlikely to explain most inceldom except for extremely physically unattractive individuals perhaps. It should be noted that men are seemingly bad at accurately judging their own looks.<ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631</ref> [[Demographics of inceldom]] suggest that there is a trend toward less sex for both men and women, which is accompanied by a trend towards later marriage, i.e. less strictly enforced monogamy. | '''Too much focus on looks''': Correlations between looks, height, income, masculinity and partner count are only weak,<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-006-9075-x</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704915604563</ref><ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2011.587758</ref><ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Across_91_studies.2C_bodily_masculinity_was_predictive_of_men.27s_mating_and_reproductive_success</ref> so looks are unlikely to explain most inceldom except for extremely physically unattractive individuals perhaps. It should be noted that men are seemingly bad at accurately judging their own looks.<ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref><ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631</ref> [[Demographics of inceldom]] suggest that there is a trend toward less sex for both men and women, which is accompanied by a trend towards later marriage, i.e. less strictly enforced monogamy. Historical evidence suggests that [[arranged marriage]] was very common, so the complete absence of marriage may pose an [[evolutionary mismatch]], resulting in inceldom. | ||
</li><li> | </li><li> | ||
'''Too little focus on economics''': Economic causes of inceldom like wealth inequality and economic stagnation come up short. Costs of living increasing discourage family formation.<ref>https://ablogaboutincels.com/2019/12/21/expectations/</ref> Millennials have only a fraction of the worth babyboomers had at the same age.<ref>http://archive.is/wip/z8CaW</ref> Many blackpillers only focus on hypergamy as an economic issue. | '''Too little focus on economics''': Economic causes of inceldom like wealth inequality and economic stagnation come up short. Costs of living increasing discourage family formation.<ref>https://ablogaboutincels.com/2019/12/21/expectations/</ref> Millennials have only a fraction of the worth babyboomers had at the same age.<ref>http://archive.is/wip/z8CaW</ref> Many blackpillers only focus on hypergamy as an economic issue. | ||
| Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
</li><li> | </li><li> | ||
'''Nurture vs nature''': In particular socialist, [[social constructionist]], [[bluepill]]ed and [[purplepill]]ed spaces criticize that the blackpill relies too heavily on [[biological essentialism]], i.e. sees human nature as more inflexible than it is. | '''Nurture vs nature''': In particular socialist, [[social constructionist]], [[bluepill]]ed and [[purplepill]]ed spaces criticize that the blackpill relies too heavily on [[biological essentialism]], i.e. sees human nature as more inflexible than it is. | ||
</li><li> | |||
'''Too much focus on fast [[life history]] women''': As little as 7% of women have used the most popular dating app [[Tinder]] in 2020.<ref>https://www.statista.com/statistics/814691/share-of-us-internet-users-who-use-tinder-by-gender/</ref> Also data on [[demographics|sexual activity]] in the U.S. suggests that only a small minority of women is currently engaging in a promiscuous lifestyle. These are presumably particular women with a genetic disposition for a fast life history, i.e. they are promiscuous and do not invest much in the offspring (i.e. [[NAWALT]]). Women who truly enjoy [[rape]] are presumably also a minority of women with a fast life history mating strategy.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZMb5eij6dI</ref> | |||
</li><li> | |||
'''Sex is not distributed 80/20''': As the [[hypergamy]] article explains, sex is not as unequally distributed as 80/20, but only around 60/20, meaning 20% of men have 60% of the sex, and this is similar for women and men. As the [[demography]] article shows, sex has declined for both sexes and there is little evidence for a rise in sexual inequality favoring few [[Chad]]s. | |||
</li><li> | |||
'''Women are not more lookist than men''': As explained in the [[Scientific_Blackpill_(Summary)|Scientific Blackpill]], in dating apps, men and women aim up in looks to roughly the same degree. In some studies, men are even more choosy about looks than men.<ref>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513899000331</ref> | |||
</li></ul> | </li></ul> | ||