Female sneakiness: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
== Causes ==
== Causes ==


Female sneakiness likely derives from sex differences in [[wikipedia:Parental investment|parental investment]] causing women to be [[Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental)#Almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women|weaker]] and dependent, meaning there is evolutionary pressure for women to develop certain strategies to extract resources from men and others such as lying, manipulation and stealing.
Female sneakiness likely derives from sex differences in [[wikipedia:Parental investment|parental investment]] causing women to be [[Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental)#Almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women|weaker]] and dependent, meaning there is evolutionary pressure for women to develop certain strategies to extract resources from men and others such as lying, manipulation, stealing and [[female hypoagency|hypoagency]].
Female sneakiness may also be regarded as a [[neoteny|neoteneous]] trait as children are also often held less responsible for their own actions, thus one finds them more likely getting away with lies, reaffirming their [[female solipsism|solipsism]]. But conversely, neoteny can be regarded as a ''sneaky'' trait, as it ensures getting resources without doing anything.
Female sneakiness may also be regarded as a [[neoteny|neoteneous]] trait as children are also often held less responsible for their own actions, thus one finds them more likely getting away with lies, reaffirming their [[female solipsism|solipsism]]. But conversely, neoteny can be regarded as a ''sneaky'' trait, as it ensures getting resources without doing anything.
Women also had higher [[reproductive success]] throughout human history, so they more likely reproduced no matter how poorly they behaved. Men, on the other hand, may have been more selected for cooperation.
Women also had higher [[reproductive success]] throughout human history, so they more likely reproduced no matter how poorly they behaved. Men, on the other hand, may have been more selected for cooperation.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu