Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homosexuality: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Dominant-submissive dichotomy
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
</li></ul> | </li></ul> | ||
Gay men identifying as the bottom are more likely later in the birth order which so it may be related to weakness and mutational load<ref name="ref41"></ref> and exclusive homosexuals exhibit other markers [[mutants|mutational load]] as summarized by the [[#Statistics|statistics]] below, | Gay men identifying as the bottom are more likely later in the birth order which so it may be related to weakness and mutational load<ref name="ref41"></ref> and exclusive homosexuals exhibit other markers [[mutants|mutational load]] as summarized by the [[#Statistics|statistics]] below. Further, mutational load has increased due to declining ecological harshness.<ref>https://www.amazon.co.uk/At-Our-Wits-End-Intelligent/dp/184540985X</ref> This suggests, the group of men self-identifying as exclusive homosexuals is unlikely to be representative of human sexuality in the past or the present. | ||
It is sufficient there to be selective pressure for (bisexual) androphilia in men for exclusive male homosexuality to emerge more often as an extreme instantiation of that adaptation. | It is sufficient there to be selective pressure for (bisexual) androphilia in men for exclusive male homosexuality to emerge more often as an extreme instantiation of that adaptation. | ||
That being said, | That being said, high mutational load is not a judgement or insult. It is simply a genetic condition, much like being physically ill or weak is not an insult. | ||
===Other evolutionary hypotheses=== | ===Other evolutionary hypotheses=== | ||