Homosexuality: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
73 bytes added ,  26 February 2021
make lede more general, move dominance aspect to it's relevant subsection
(make lede more general, move dominance aspect to it's relevant subsection)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Homosexuality''' is the sexual attraction to the same sex. This article primarily discusses the [[dominance hierarchy|dominance signaling]] aspect of homosocial and homosexual behavior, the low-status aspect of submissive homosexuality, and resulting intrasexual competition by accusations of gayness. It also discusses Muscarella's ''alliance formation hypothesis''<ref name="ref5">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref>  which claims incels can turn submissive homosexuals to form a sexual alliance with a higher status man to regain access to group resources and reproductive success ([[homocel hypothesis]]), with the higher status male also gaining some benefits, including sexual pleasure and [[signaling theory|costly signaling]] by risking accusations of gayness.
'''Homosexuality''' is the sexual attraction to the same sex. This article only covers male homosexuality since lesbians seem to be of low significance for inceldom and society at large.<ref>Despite women being much more likely considered a victim group, the term "female homosexuality" is used way less than "male homosexuality". This suggests few people really care about lesbians. Anti-lesbian homophobia is much less prevalent and men find lesbians outright sexually arousing, which may stem from the fact that lesbians in a harm implies a lower risk of cuckoldry, hence men selected from it. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=male+homosexual%2C+female+homosexual&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cmale%20homosexual%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cfemale%20homosexual%3B%2Cc0</ref>
 
This article only covers male homosexuality since lesbians seem to be of low significance for inceldom and society at large.<ref>Despite women being much more likely considered a victim group, the term "female homosexuality" is used way less than "male homosexuality". This suggests few people really care about lesbians. Anti-lesbian homophobia is much less prevalent and men find lesbians outright sexually arousing, which may stem from the fact that lesbians in a harm implies a lower risk of cuckoldry, hence men selected from it. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=male+homosexual%2C+female+homosexual&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cmale%20homosexual%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cfemale%20homosexual%3B%2Cc0</ref>
Lesbians seem to be cute, [[foid|foidish]], often [[feminism|feminists]]<ref>17% of U.S. women [https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/ identify as "strong feminists"].
Lesbians seem to be cute, [[foid|foidish]], often [[feminism|feminists]]<ref>17% of U.S. women [https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/feminism-project/poll/ identify as "strong feminists"].
1.5% or so of women [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States are lesbians (not bi)].
1.5% or so of women [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States are lesbians (not bi)].
Further, "45% of self-identified feminists in a US sample identified as non-heterosexual, predominantly gynephilious (Liss and Erchull, 2010) as compared to 5.6% in a USA probability sample (Bogaert, 2000), which means that feminists were 4.5 times more likely to be non-exclusively heterosexual." ([https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full Source]) Hence, 17% * 45% = 7.7% of women are predicted to be lesbians. By this reasoning, it highly likely that nearly all of the 1.5% lesbians are very strong feminists.</ref>
Further, "45% of self-identified feminists in a US sample identified as non-heterosexual, predominantly gynephilious (Liss and Erchull, 2010) as compared to 5.6% in a USA probability sample (Bogaert, 2000), which means that feminists were 4.5 times more likely to be non-exclusively heterosexual." ([https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full Source]) Hence, 17% * 45% = 7.7% of women are predicted to be lesbians. By this reasoning, it highly likely that nearly all of the 1.5% lesbians are very strong feminists.</ref>
and universally more tolerated than male homosexuals.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550619887785</ref>
and universally more tolerated than male homosexuals.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550619887785</ref>
Lesbianism may have been [[sexual selection|sexually selected]] behavior by men preferring their [[polygyny|harem wives]] to get additional sexual pleasure from each other rather from other men as a means of [[paternity assurance]],<ref>https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=560351713504498712&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 See section "Male Tolerance"</ref> an idea that of course [[triggered]] [[LGBT]] activists.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20201109034620/https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2018/08/the-science-of-incels-all-the-reasons-why-some-men-can-t-find-a-partner.html</ref>
Lesbianism may have been [[sexual selection|sexually selected]] behavior by men preferring their [[polygyny|harem wives]] to get additional sexual pleasure from each other rather from other men as a means of [[paternity assurance]],<ref>https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=560351713504498712&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 See section "Male Tolerance"</ref> an idea that [[LGBT]] activists [[triggered|don't like]].<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20201109034620/https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2018/08/the-science-of-incels-all-the-reasons-why-some-men-can-t-find-a-partner.html</ref>


==Prevalence and legitimacy==
==Prevalence and legitimacy==
Line 13: Line 11:
In much of Oceania, the Middle East, the Caribbean, Africa, and parts of Asia, homosexuality remains illegal and severely punishable, with some countries having a death penalty for it.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1529100616637616</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/12/gambias-president-threatens-to-slit-the-throats-of-gay-men/</ref>
In much of Oceania, the Middle East, the Caribbean, Africa, and parts of Asia, homosexuality remains illegal and severely punishable, with some countries having a death penalty for it.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1529100616637616</ref><ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/12/gambias-president-threatens-to-slit-the-throats-of-gay-men/</ref>


==Evolution==
== Evolution ==
At first glance, attraction to other men (androphilia) should be [[maladaptiveness|maladaptive]] because homosexual acts cannot produce offspring.
 
However, male homosexuality is more prevalent than what selection-mutation balance regarding androphilia and gynophilia (attraction to men and women, respectively) would predict.<ref name="ref42">http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26089486</ref>
Since homo-sexual acts cannot produce offspring, one would expect attraction to other men (androphilia) to be non-adaptive or even [[maladaptiveness|maladaptive]].
Homosexuality and androphilia are somewhat heritable (around 40%),<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9251839</ref><ref>http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2449185</ref> all of which suggests homosexuality is an adaptation, i.e. that it increased men's reproductive success in the past.
However, male homosexuality is more prevalent than what selection-mutation balance between androphilia and gynophilia (attraction women) would predict.<ref name="ref42">http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26089486</ref>
Additionally, homosexuality and androphilia are somewhat heritable (around 40%),<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9251839</ref><ref>http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2449185</ref> all of which suggests homosexuality is an adaptation, i.e. that it increased men's reproductive success in the past.
 
=== Dominant-submissive dichotomy ===
 
Various aspects pertaining to [[dominance hierarchy|social dominance]] can be found in homosocial and homosexual behavior.
Namely, penetration can be identified as a high-status activity, whereas the role of the penetree is associated with low status.
 
F. Muscarella proposed incels can turn into submissive homosexuals to form a sexual alliances with higher status men to regain access to group resources and reproductive success ([[homocel hypothesis]]), with the higher status male also gaining some benefits, including sexual pleasure and support.<ref name="ref5">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref>


===Dominant vs submissive===
Further, it is conceivable that the integral low-status of the penetree results in intrasexual competition in shape of gossip and shaming, affecting reproductive success.


There are seemingly various conceivable pathways toward increased reproductive success (RS) through homosexual behavior in terms of the dominant vs submissive dichotomy, explaining homosexuality as an evolved behavior: Promiscuity/sodomy (RS for penetrator), alliance (RS for penetrator and penetree), [[intrasexual competition]] by gossip (RS for accuser), homosexuality and homosocialty as costly signal by thwarting said gossip (RS for both, mostly for the penetrator). These pathways are explained in detail below.
There are various conceivable pathways toward increased reproductive success (RS) through homosexual behavior in terms of the dominant vs submissive dichotomy, explaining homosexuality as an evolved behavior: Promiscuity/sodomy (RS for penetrator), alliance (RS for penetrator and penetree), [[intrasexual competition]] by gossip (RS for accuser), homosexuality and homosocialty as costly signal by thwarting said gossip (RS for both, mostly for the penetrator). These pathways are explained in detail below.


<ul><li>
<ul><li>
17,538

edits

Navigation menu