Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Love shy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Criticism of Gilmartin's writings
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
Another point of criticism may be that love-shyness considers confidence in sexual matters as an isolated issue. Within a more general framework of human [[dominance hierarchy|dominance behavior]], the inability to court a female is probably mostly related to social status, e.g. social status explains 62% of the variance in copulation opportunities for men<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref> | Another point of criticism may be that love-shyness considers confidence in sexual matters as an isolated issue. Within a more general framework of human [[dominance hierarchy|dominance behavior]], the inability to court a female is probably mostly related to social status, e.g. social status explains 62% of the variance in copulation opportunities for men<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref> | ||
and likely plays a role for women too. | and likely plays a role for women too. | ||
Love-shy individuals likely often lack the required amount of social status that would admit them to confidently lead a relationship and overcome women's reluctance to have sex, and not fear shaming in case they turn out to be a failure in sexual matters. Low status may be due to any number of flaws in physical appearance ([[ugliness|beauty]], [[fatcel|overweight]]), behavior ([[autism]], [[fuckupcel|lack of competence]]) or [[NEETcel|economic standing]], based on which human dominance hierarchies are decided. This is aggravated by [[feminism|feminists]] outright shaming men who confidently and forcefully approach women and forcing them to be [[nice guy|nice]], even though most women seem to prefer [[rape#Rape_fantasies|being dominated]]. A main limiting factor in men's sexual and social success may hence be attributable to a rise of social norms that hinder men in their assertion of dominance, a point that [[Jordan Peterson]] repeatedly raised. Excessive shyness may also be caused by evolutionary mismatches such as the such as the absence of arranged marriage<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704919887706</ref> | Love-shy individuals likely often lack the required amount of social status that would admit them to confidently lead a relationship and overcome women's reluctance to have sex, and not fear shaming in case they turn out to be a failure in sexual matters. Low status may be due to any number of flaws in physical appearance ([[ugliness|beauty]], [[fatcel|overweight]]), behavior ([[autism]], [[fuckupcel|lack of competence]]) or [[NEETcel|economic standing]], based on which human dominance hierarchies are decided. This is aggravated by [[feminism|feminists]] outright shaming men who confidently and forcefully approach women and forcing them to be [[nice guy|nice]], even though most women seem to prefer [[rape#Rape_fantasies|being dominated]]. A main limiting factor in men's sexual and social success may hence be attributable to a rise of social norms that hinder men in their assertion of dominance, a point that [[Jordan Peterson]] repeatedly raised. Excessive shyness may also be caused by evolutionary mismatches such as the such as the absence of arranged marriage,<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1474704919887706</ref> women's unusual high-status role,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men</ref> overpopulation, or even the rise of mutations (see [[behavioral sink]]). | ||
==Press attention== | ==Press attention== | ||