Feminism: Difference between revisions

'''Feminism''' is the process by which women take credit for the innovations by mostly celibate men which made them want to enter the workforce more. Feminism is the logical outcome of advanced industry/technology and the natural proclivity of females to maximize their mating strategy of [[hypergamy]] in liberal countries.

[[File:Redpillcomics19.jpg|thumb|right|<center></center>‎]]

They even created campaigns against these increasing amount of men lower on the social hierarchy than them they are not sexually attracted to, with the most extreme advocating [[androcide]]. Movements like:

A world where young women make more money than young men would seem to necessitate an increase in house-husbands.  The [[male liberation]] movement, a subset of male [[feminist]] [[MRA|MRAs]] in the 60s wanted a dramatic increase in househusbands.  However even in the most feminist countries, women will still expect the man to work or else a breakup, '''even if she makes enough to provide for the family in an uber-welfare state'''.  This is of course, insanely pointless.   

It seems that women therefore, naturally recoil at the idea of not using a man to financially provide for her, calling such men who are poor or who don't live up to masculine gender roles as, "manchildren", no matter how generous the welfare state she is in or how much money she makes.

So far we see that feminism literally creates incels, but there '''may''' be a silver lining in a 100% feminist universe compared to a partial feminist universe, in that feminists feminize societies to the point where all men are so beta that the male intra-sexual competition may become smaller.  Since no men ask women out in the 100% feminist universe once men are so [[beta]].  Becoming more feminist but not getting to 100% feminism may also be desirable for incels to avoid polygamy.  Because of the impetus for women to achieve college degrees *and date*, assuming monogamy is enforced by non-feminist entities, feminism may continue to force more women to date down in educational status, letting more men not have to date complete morons.

[[Otto Weininger]] argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female [[sexual liberation]] becomes.  Whereas, if there is high [[sexual dimorphism]] in humans, female sexual liberation leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and [[IM LIEK SUCH A NERD LOL|corruption of the arts and science by feminine women expressing vanity and seeking male attention]].

[[File:Roosh112.png|1200x1200px|center|Pick-up aritve Roosh V found that Denmark was not sexually dimorphic for him to exercise "game"]]

Because feminism has created more incels, many if not most self-identified incels don't subscribe to the previous theory and think '''modern''' matriarchies won't be sexually generous.  Also, given prominent feminists have explicitly called for an, "end of men", anti-feminists have every right to be wary of feminist's attitude towards the health of men.   

Anti-feminists should argue for a generous patriarchy with strictly socially enforced monogamy as not all patriarchies are alike.  In most if not all modern patriarchal countries, [[polygyny]] arises and men hoard women, causing [[inceldom]] as well.  And in patriarchal muslim countries, the hoarding of women in harems, inflates the bride-price so high that there exists a vast underclass of singe men who are susceptible to the promise of either real life brides or virgin brides in the afterlife through terrorist organization like [[al-Qaeda]] or [[ISIS]].<ref> https://www.economist.com/christmas-specials/2017/12/19/the-link-between-polygamy-and-war</ref> It is for this reason that people joke about incels and muslim terrorists on incel boards.  Some incels also believe that the only kind of pro-natalism that can be achieved to wipe out [[inceldom]] would be through a racial supremacist movement, which partly explains why people like [[Richard Spencer]] pander to incels.

[[File:Abundant.png|thumb|right|As mentioned before, feminists regularly celebrate male disposability]]

Feminists in the United States take it as almost axiomatic that human penises are disgusting.  Modern US millennial feminist posters relentlessly shame penises as being 'abundant and therefore low value and not important', [[neoliberalism|implying that male sexuality '''should''' be evaluated on a fwee mawket demand/supply curve rather than society adjusting for inequality]].  Men are taught from a very early age to be ashamed of their genitalia by religion, but once they enter the adult world, this shaming is also partly institutionalized by feminism.  The process of making men ashamed of their own sexual organs is part of the 'neutering' process critics of feminism reference.  Penis shaming also probably contributes to perverted forms of male exhibitionism, which is often done in desperation of female recognition.  The goal of penis shaming is to lower the value of men, and it's working.

{{clear}}

[[File:Feminism.jpg|thumb|right]]

In general, feminists hate any studies which have to do with mating, including but not limited to studies from sociology, social psychology, and evolutionary biology. The main arch nemesis of feminism in the social sciences is evolutionary psychology, which many feminists regard as a pseudo-scientific veneer over its practitioners misogyny, despite there existing a minor trend in feminism that attempts to integrate some of its findings as they pertain to women and the relations between the sexes.  

There is also a trend in modern feminism that regards the very Aristotelean foundations of Western empirical though as being a mere artefact of the patriachy; a male imposition of rigid logic in opposition to the supposedly superior 'female intuition'.

{{clear}}

==References==

<references />

==See Also==

[[Category:Neoliberals]][[Category:Theories]]

{{A}}