Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Feminism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Social Darwinist feminism
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
== Social Darwinist feminism == | == Social Darwinist feminism == | ||
Some feminist anti-incels hold social Darwinist, [[eugenics|eugenicist]] views and believe in the [[good genes hypothesis]] that women always choose the best genes and hence women's sexual liberation is a great benefit for humanity as men with poor genes won't reproduce as much. As such, they see the incidence of male incels as natural and welcome development. One such feminist activist even worked for the FBI.<ref> | Some feminist anti-incels hold social Darwinist,<ref>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/woman-who-tried-take-down-darwin-180967146/</ref> [[eugenics|eugenicist]] views and believe in the [[good genes hypothesis]] that women always choose the best genes and hence women's sexual liberation is a great benefit for humanity as men with poor genes won't reproduce as much. As such, they see the incidence of male incels as natural and welcome development. One such feminist activist even worked for the FBI.<ref>http://archive.is/ZiejW</ref> In truth, there is little evidence that female mate choice is beneficial for humanity. Rather, a significant share of women seems to submit to highly dominant and anti-social men,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Personality</ref> and sex partner count among males is only very weakly correlated with overall health status.<ref>http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/1/160603</ref> | ||
== Anti-science == | == Anti-science == | ||