Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Men with deeper voices have more children and sexual partners
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3,537: | Line 3,537: | ||
* Arnocky S, et al. 2018. ''Do men with more masculine voices have better immunocompetence?.'' [[http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003 Abstract]] | * Arnocky S, et al. 2018. ''Do men with more masculine voices have better immunocompetence?.'' [[http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003 Abstract]] | ||
* O’Connor JJM, et al. 2014. ''Perceptions of infidelity risk predict women’s preferences for low male voice pitch in short-term over long-term relationship contexts''.[[http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.029 Abstract]] | * O’Connor JJM, et al. 2014. ''Perceptions of infidelity risk predict women’s preferences for low male voice pitch in short-term over long-term relationship contexts''.[[http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.029 Abstract]] | ||
===Social dialect and men’s voice pitch influence women’s mate preferences=== | |||
O’Connor et al. (2014) examined if male voice pitch and social dialect influence women's perceptions of men's socioeconomic status and attractiveness. They found women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices. Furthermore, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness. They also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men's voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status. Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status. Finally, women's own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch. Hence, women's preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women's preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch. | |||
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span> | |||
* O’Connor JJM, Fraccaro PJ, Pisanski K, Tigue CC, O’Donnell TJ, Feinberg DR. 2014. ''Social dialect and men’s voice pitch influence women’s mate preferences.'' Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 368–375. [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.001 Abstract]] | |||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Among_male_CEOs.2C_voice_pitch_is_a_significant_predictor_of_earnings">Among male CEOs, voice pitch is a significant predictor of earnings</span>=== | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Among_male_CEOs.2C_voice_pitch_is_a_significant_predictor_of_earnings">Among male CEOs, voice pitch is a significant predictor of earnings</span>=== | ||