Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Homocel hypothesis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Evidence
(video down) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Peripheralized males engaging in homosexual behavior (grooming, penis display and touching, and sodomy) can be also found in various primate species, and has been observed in all-male societies of pirates, as well as in vulnerable British men transported to Australia as punishment for crimes. | Peripheralized males engaging in homosexual behavior (grooming, penis display and touching, and sodomy) can be also found in various primate species, and has been observed in all-male societies of pirates, as well as in vulnerable British men transported to Australia as punishment for crimes. | ||
Homoerotic alliances between low and high status males are also evidenced in reports of working-class England at the turn of the century, Australian Aborigines, tribes in Melanesia and Papua (though homosexuality in some Melanesian cultures often has a ritualized, religious element<ref>https://www.jstor.org/stable/646389?seq=1</ref>), New Guinea, contemporary Thailand, and Edo era Japan.<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref><ref>https://soranews24.com/2015/01/21/edo-era-samurai-were-pretty-gay/</ref> | |||
Muscarella suggested peripheralized men can establish sexually intimate social ties with sexually frustrated men of higher social standing, to partially re-gain their access to resources and potentially restoring some | Muscarella suggested peripheralized men can establish sexually intimate social ties with sexually frustrated men of higher social standing, to partially re-gain their access to resources and potentially restoring some [[reproductive success]] (and hence be adaptive behavior).<ref>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J082v40n01_03</ref> Pederasty in several cultures like Romans and Ancient Japan may be related to such adaptive behavior as the growing boys often lack status and can gain access to resources through a more dominant/older male, as well as get resources in terms of knowledge being passed on from a more experienced male. | ||
Resources are scarcer and hence more important in [[life history|harsh ecologies]] such as the winter in Northern/Eastern hemispheres, so one would expect [[life history|k-selected]] males there to exhibit more homocel and homosocial behavior to get some crumbs in dire conditions, whereas peripheralized males in easy, tropical ecologies can simply pick fruits all year long. Evidence for this may be that U.S. Asians are three times more likely to report a homosexual orientation than the country average.<ref>http://akinokure.blogspot.com/2012/11/in-east-asians-blunted-sense-of-disgust.html</ref> | |||
Evidence for homocel hypothesis can also be found in [[Behavioral sink|mouse utopia experiments]], where socially deprived rodents in extremely overpopulated environments started engaging in deviant sexual behavior, including homosexuality. | Evidence for homocel hypothesis can also be found in [[Behavioral sink|mouse utopia experiments]], where socially deprived rodents in extremely overpopulated environments started engaging in deviant sexual behavior, including homosexuality. | ||