Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Women prefer men with dominant, aggressive and wide faces (high fWHR)
| Line 2,336: | Line 2,336: | ||
It is not clear to which extent the preferences for long-term dating are affected by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias social desirability bias], i.e. women possibly say they are not as choosy about superficial, masculine traits for LTRs because there is societal pressure for them to value non-superficial traits instead. Actual mate choices would be more informative than stated preferences. | It is not clear to which extent the preferences for long-term dating are affected by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_desirability_bias social desirability bias], i.e. women possibly say they are not as choosy about superficial, masculine traits for LTRs because there is societal pressure for them to value non-superficial traits instead. Actual mate choices would be more informative than stated preferences. | ||
The importance of fWHR becomes apparent in light of a secular change in skull proportions during the last century, with the ''head and face becoming taller and narrower'' (Jantz 2001), which includes a narrowing of the mandible. Causes for this are uncertain, whether a change in diet or increase in pollutants disturbing natural development (Proffit 2018). This may suggest that there exist now more men with such narrow and elongated faces that they fall below what is aesthetically attractive to women, whereas women may more less negatively affected by this since a compact midface and a wide chin is not as critical to female aesthetics. Though | The importance of fWHR becomes apparent in light of a secular change in skull proportions during the last century, with the ''head and face becoming taller and narrower'' (Jantz 2001), which includes a narrowing of the mandible. Causes for this are uncertain, whether a change in diet or increase in pollutants disturbing natural development (Proffit 2018). This may suggest that there exist now more men with such narrow and elongated faces that they fall below what is aesthetically attractive to women, whereas women may more less negatively affected by this since a compact midface and a wide chin is not as critical to female aesthetics. Though the secular trend regarding fWHR overall may also negatively affect women as fWHR is not [[sexual dimorphism|sexually dimorphic]]. | ||
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span> | <span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span> | ||
[[File:fwhr-examples.jpg|thumb|none|300px|Example of high vs. low fWHR male faces. fWHR is measured from the width of the zygomatic arches and height between the vermillion border of the upper lip and midbrow point at the top. ]] | [[File:fwhr-examples.jpg|thumb|none|300px|Example of high vs. low fWHR male faces. fWHR is measured from the width of the zygomatic arches and height between the vermillion border of the upper lip and midbrow point at the top.]] | ||
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Data:'''</span> | <span style="font-size:125%">'''Data:'''</span> | ||