6,480
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Across 91 studies, bodily masculinity was predictive of men's mating and reproductive success
| Line 3,347: | Line 3,347: | ||
Effect sizes of the studies included in the analysis were standardized and measured by Pearson's ''r'', and the outcomes for each of the measures of phenotypic masculinity are reproduced below, in the data section. | Effect sizes of the studies included in the analysis were standardized and measured by Pearson's ''r'', and the outcomes for each of the measures of phenotypic masculinity are reproduced below, in the data section. | ||
Overall, body masculinity, height, Testosterone level, a deeper voice and 2:4D Digit Ratio, a purported measure of prenatal testosterone exposure, were all significantly predictive of mating success, while facial masculinity was not. | Overall, body masculinity, height, Testosterone level, a deeper voice, and 2:4D Digit Ratio, a purported measure of prenatal testosterone exposure, were all significantly predictive of mating success, while facial masculinity was not. | ||
Of the various measures of physical masculinity that were examined, only body masculinity was found to be significantly associated with men's [[reproductive success]]. | Of the various measures of physical masculinity that were examined, only body masculinity was found to be significantly associated with men's [[reproductive success]]. | ||