Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

{| class="wikitable"

|-

|-

|}

{| class="wikitable"

|-

|-

|}

<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>

* ''The strongest associations with mating outcomes were seen in terms of body masculinity (r= .133, 95% CI: [0.091, 0.176]), voice pitch (r= .132, 95% CI: [0.061, 0.204]), and testosterone levels (r= .097, 95% CI: [0.070, 0.125]); moderation analyses showed that these three effects did not significantly differ from each other (p> .05). Height and 2D:4Dwere also significant predictors of mating success, but showed significantly smaller effect sizes than body, voice or testosterone levels (height: r= .057, CI: [0.027, 0.087]; 2D:4D: r= .034, CI: [0.000, 0.069]). The relationship between facial masculinity and mating success was not significant (r= 0.080, 95% CI: [-0.003, 0.164]).''

* ''In the second set of analyses, we tested the hypothesis that masculine traits and testosterone levels positively predict reproductive success. As Tables 3 and 4 show, relationships were in the predicted direction,but body masculinity was the only significant predictor (r = .119, 95% CI: [0.058, 0.182).''

<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>

* Lidbord LH, Cross CP, Boothroyd LG. 2020. ''Masculinity matters(but mostly if you’re muscular):A meta-analysis of the relationships between sexually dimorphic traits in men and mating/reproductive success''. Preprint copy. [[https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896 Abstract]][[https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.06.980896v1.full.pdf FullText]]

* Scott IML, Clark AP, Boothroyd LG, Penton-Voak IS. 2013. ''Do men’s faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?''. Behavioral Ecology, 24: pp 579–589. [[https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars092 FullText]]