Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→New lede
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
:Would be good if the first sentence contained more information density that distinguished the blackpilll from just a belief in lookism (as it is indeed more than that), for exame also carrying the general philosophical underpinning from the first definition on, that women are sexually inflexible in desire. Also a truly NPOV lede would be even harsher than what I wrote.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | :Would be good if the first sentence contained more information density that distinguished the blackpilll from just a belief in lookism (as it is indeed more than that), for exame also carrying the general philosophical underpinning from the first definition on, that women are sexually inflexible in desire. Also a truly NPOV lede would be even harsher than what I wrote.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
Its worth noting that r/truecels were the first active blackpill board and we're quite explicit they wanted legalized rape. That thought pattern continued into thousands of forum posts outside r/truecels and a blackpiller in Virginia even ran a campaign advocating legal rape. To whitewash that seems odd, the belief in legal rape was even in r/truecels sidebar infobox. | :Its worth noting that r/truecels were the first active blackpill board and we're quite explicit they wanted legalized rape. That thought pattern continued into thousands of forum posts outside r/truecels and a blackpiller in Virginia even ran a campaign advocating legal rape. To whitewash that seems odd, the belief in legal rape was even in r/truecels sidebar infobox.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | ||