Courtship: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
38 bytes removed ,  27 February 2020
Line 7: Line 7:
== Effectiveness ==
== Effectiveness ==


What can be achieved by courtship e.g. by "[[game]]" is probably highly overrated as research indicates that initial romantic interest is mainly about looks and personality traits such as extroversion do not play any role (see [[Game#Ineffectiveness|Game § Ineffectiveness]]). Instead, access to women is largely determined by [[dominance hierarchy|dominance status]] among males as determined by [[LMS|looks, resources, status]], [[IQ|competence]] etc.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>
What can be achieved by courtship and "[[game]]" seems to be highly overrated as research indicates initial romantic interest is mainly about looks and that personality traits such as extroversion do not play any role. Instead, access to women is largely determined by [[dominance hierarchy|dominance status]] among males as determined by [[LMS|looks, resources, status]], [[IQ|competence]], [[neurotypical]]ity etc.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>
Courtship hence mainly amounts to a coy waiting time in which the female tests her suitor and gathers social information about him (see [[Sex drive#Female_passivity|female passivity]]).<ref name="tradeinfo">Wachtmeister, C.A. and Enquist, M., 1999. ''The evolution of female coyness–trading time for information.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1273 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="optimal">McNamara, J.M., Fromhage, L., Barta, Z. and Houston, A.I.. 2008. ''The optimal coyness game.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00487.x Abstract]]</ref><ref name="biobasis">Grammer K. 1989. ''Human  courtship  behaviour: biological  basis  and  cognitive processing.'' In: Rasa, A.E., Vogel, C. and Voland,E. (eds.): The Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies Chapmann and Hall,1989, New York. [[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8eab/95d1298b5165b84872c533f4f46a7805a0e4.pdf FullText]]</ref> The [[sex sons hypothesis]] suggests, women won't be as coy if the man is good looking and sexy.
Courtship hence mainly amounts to a coy waiting time in which the female tests her suitor and gathers social information about him (see [[Sex drive#Female_passivity|female passivity]]).<ref name="tradeinfo">Wachtmeister, C.A. and Enquist, M., 1999. ''The evolution of female coyness–trading time for information.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1273 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="optimal">McNamara, J.M., Fromhage, L., Barta, Z. and Houston, A.I.. 2008. ''The optimal coyness game.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00487.x Abstract]]</ref><ref name="biobasis">Grammer K. 1989. ''Human  courtship  behaviour: biological  basis  and  cognitive processing.'' In: Rasa, A.E., Vogel, C. and Voland,E. (eds.): The Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies Chapmann and Hall,1989, New York. [[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8eab/95d1298b5165b84872c533f4f46a7805a0e4.pdf FullText]]</ref> The [[sex sons hypothesis]] suggests, women won't be as coy if the man is good looking and sexy.


17,538

edits

Navigation menu