Courtship: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
818 bytes added ,  27 February 2020
Line 7: Line 7:
== Effectiveness ==
== Effectiveness ==


What can be achieved by courtship e.g. by "[[game]]" is probably highly overrated as research indicates that initial romantic interest is mainly about looks and personality traits such as extroversion do not play any role (see [[Game#Ineffectiveness|Game § Ineffectiveness]]). Instead, access to women is largely determined by [[dominance hierarchy|dominance status]] among males as determined by [[LMS|looks, resources and status]].<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>
What can be achieved by courtship e.g. by "[[game]]" is probably highly overrated as research indicates that initial romantic interest is mainly about looks and personality traits such as extroversion do not play any role (see [[Game#Ineffectiveness|Game § Ineffectiveness]]). Instead, access to women is largely determined by [[dominance hierarchy|dominance status]] among males as determined by [[LMS|looks, resources, status]], [[IQ|competence]] etc.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities</ref>
Courtship hence mainly amounts to a coy waiting time in which the female tests her partner and gathers social information about the suitor (see [[Sex drive#Female_passivity|Sex drive § Female passivity]]).
Courtship hence mainly amounts to a coy waiting time in which the female tests her suitor and gathers social information about him (see [[Sex drive#Female_passivity|female passivity]]).<ref name="tradeinfo">Wachtmeister, C.A. and Enquist, M., 1999. ''The evolution of female coyness–trading time for information.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1273 Abstract]]</ref><ref name="optimal">McNamara, J.M., Fromhage, L., Barta, Z. and Houston, A.I.. 2008. ''The optimal coyness game.'' [[https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00487.x Abstract]]</ref><ref name="biobasis">Grammer K. 1989. ''Human  courtship  behaviour: biological  basis  and  cognitive processing.'' In: Rasa, A.E., Vogel, C. and Voland,E. (eds.): The Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies Chapmann and Hall,1989, New York. [[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8eab/95d1298b5165b84872c533f4f46a7805a0e4.pdf FullText]]</ref> The [[sex sons hypothesis]] suggests, women won't be as coy if the man is good looking and sexy.


This suggests any kind of behavioral traits that do matter in courtship are likely limited to "sub-personality" behavior such as smiling, facial expressiveness, [[neurotypical]]ity etc., which may be instances of [[Beauty#Beautiful_behavior|beautiful behavior]] selected by [[Fisherian runaway|runaway selection]], but may also have evolved for the necessity of social signaling and group cohesion.
This suggests any kind of behavioral traits that do matter in courtship are likely limited to "sub-personality" behavior such as smiling, facial expressiveness, [[neurotypical]]ity etc., which may be instances of [[Beauty#Beautiful_behavior|beautiful behavior]] selected by [[Fisherian runaway|runaway selection]], but may also have evolved for the necessity of social signaling and group cohesion.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu