Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 685: Line 685:
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Discussion:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Discussion:'''</span>


Geoffrey Miller's [[Fisherian runaway#Behavior|''mating mind'' hypothesis]] of human intelligence states that higher cognition and much of human behavior may have evolved as "cognitive ornament" though [[Fisherian runaway|positive-feedback processes]] in sexual selection. Such runaway selection predicts not only exaggerated ornament, but also highly narrowed and exaggerated preference for such ornament. This may suggest the struggles high-functioning autists face may in part be rooted in social exclusion based on sexually selected preferences for highly specific modes of facial and emotional expressiveness in similar manner as humans and other animals superficially but strongly judge based on subtle cues of physical appearance despite them being largely unrelated to health and ability, i.e. this may be evidence of a ''few millimeters of emotional expressiveness'' and [[charisma]] in analogy to [[a few millimeters of bone]] that strongly decide about social and sexual exclusion.
Geoffrey Miller's [[Fisherian runaway#Behavior|''mating mind'' hypothesis]] of human intelligence states that higher cognition and much of human behavior may have evolved as "cognitive ornament" though [[Fisherian runaway|positive-feedback processes]] in sexual selection. Such runaway selection predicts not only exaggerated ornament, but also highly narrowed and exaggerated preference for such ornament. This may suggest the struggles high-functioning autists face may in part be rooted in social exclusion based on sexually selected preferences for highly specific modes of facial and emotional expressiveness in similar manner as humans and other animals superficially but strongly judge based on subtle cues of physical appearance despite them being largely unrelated to health and ability, i.e. this may be evidence of a ''few millimeters of emotional expressiveness'' and [[charisma]] in analogy to [[a few millimeters of bone]] that contribute to social and sexual exclusion.


This finding also brings into question the often touted claim that autists fail socially because they can't read social cues and accidentally offend people, especially as autists do not score lower in some components of empathy, in some even higher than [[neurotypical]]s (Song 2019).
This finding also brings into question the often touted claim that autists fail socially primarily because they can't read social cues and accidentally offend people, especially since autists do not score lower in some components of empathy, in some even higher than [[neurotypical]]s (Song 2019).
 
The natural aversion to subtle differences in emotional expressiveness that may play a role in the social difficulties that autists face, may also be a driver of racism as each race may be finely attuned to particular cognitive ornament specific to their race. For example, Albert Einstein perceived the Northeast Asians as [https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia obtuse].


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
17,538

edits

Navigation menu