Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Creepiness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The term is intentionally ambiguous. Women know that if they were being completely honest and said "ugly, short guys should eat dust", they would be viewed unfavorably and shallow. Therefore, in order to blameshift, or to covertly act like a chameleon and having a constantly moving goal-post with regards to their moral compass, an ambiguous term such as "creepy" is a welcome adjective in the chameleon's vocabulary. | The term is intentionally ambiguous. Women know that if they were being completely honest and said "ugly, short guys should eat dust", they would be viewed unfavorably and shallow. Therefore, in order to blameshift, or to covertly act like a chameleon and having a constantly moving goal-post with regards to their moral compass, an ambiguous term such as "creepy" is a welcome adjective in the chameleon's vocabulary. | ||
Ugly men are not more criminal to meaningful extent,<ref>https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019</ref> so the [[failo effect]] misleads people into thinking creepy | Ugly men are not more criminal to meaningful extent,<ref>https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019</ref> so the [[failo effect]] misleads people into thinking <s>ugly</s> creepy men are more criminal. | ||
== Attractive men are less likely considered creepy == | == Attractive men are less likely considered creepy == | ||