Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Game: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Inter-wiki citation
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Should be avoided. It creates issues down the road. Nothing to do with dislike of any particular page.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 10:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | Should be avoided. It creates issues down the road. Nothing to do with dislike of any particular page.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 10:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I generally agree, but in my opinion, the Scientific Blackpill can be seen as an exception to this rule because it is essentially a book with discussions and links. It is a citable source and provides better summaries than the studies' abstracts themselves and incel-relevant discussions. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 12:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | : I generally agree, but in my opinion, the Scientific Blackpill can be seen as an exception to this rule because it is essentially a book with discussions and links. It is a citable source and provides better summaries than the studies' abstracts themselves and incel-relevant discussions. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 12:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
::For contested articles, this creates a situation where you move to another page for fact-checking, so at least on contested pages, just lift the sources from the SB page.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | ::For contested articles, this creates a situation where you move to another page (that does have editorializing) for fact-checking, so at least on contested pages, just lift the sources from the SB page.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
=="Multiple studies"== | =="Multiple studies"== | ||