Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
User talk:William: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Please restore game
| Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
:The main problem wasn't readability, problem was his citations were mostly bunk, as far as their relation to his claims. Is that what you changed? [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 21:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC) | :The main problem wasn't readability, problem was his citations were mostly bunk, as far as their relation to his claims. Is that what you changed? [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 21:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah, I removed all parts he misunderstood or that were unsourced and/or rambling. But i agree with your changes since. I think it is OK to cite the Scientific Blackpill as it contains summaries and discussions much like a book. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 00:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | :: Yeah, I removed all parts he misunderstood or that were unsourced and/or rambling. But i agree with your changes since. I think it is OK to cite the Scientific Blackpill as it contains summaries and discussions much like a book. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 00:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::Changes were made to the revision you wanted it reverted to. Would suggest using the game talk page for the future. There were a few studies in there that were interesting.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 10:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC) | |||