Genghis Khan: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Genghis Khan (edit)

Revision as of 17:07, 19 February 2020

1,630 bytes removed ,  19 February 2020
→‎Is 'evil' behavior adaptive?
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


Many genetic researchers have attempted to infer Genghis Khan's haplogroup to determine how many living descendants he and his ancestors have. Zerjal et al. (2003) claimed that 8% of people in "a large region of Asia" were likely descended from Genghis khan, 0.5% of the world's total population. <ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180246/</ref> This finding has been hotly disputed however, and recent evidence (Wei et al. 2018) could find no evidence that the universal ruler himself belonged to this haplogroup, however, the haplogroup is associated with Genghis' own clan, the Niru’un.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839053/</ref>
Many genetic researchers have attempted to infer Genghis Khan's haplogroup to determine how many living descendants he and his ancestors have. Zerjal et al. (2003) claimed that 8% of people in "a large region of Asia" were likely descended from Genghis khan, 0.5% of the world's total population. <ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1180246/</ref> This finding has been hotly disputed however, and recent evidence (Wei et al. 2018) could find no evidence that the universal ruler himself belonged to this haplogroup, however, the haplogroup is associated with Genghis' own clan, the Niru’un.<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839053/</ref>
==Is 'evil' behavior adaptive?==
Consider the most reproductively successful mans behavior. Women and or men's attraction to [[dark triad]] traits in the opposite sex, is a [[rationality|rational]] [[reproductive success|reproductively strategy]] to produce hi fertility sons. Even if most of these sons within a dark triad  population ends up a [[GDE|genetic failure]], the one or few sons that succeed make up for the losses.
Why human beings across time and culture view violent, genetically adaptive behavior as evil or for the more religious among us sinful, remains an unsolved mystery.
One theory is non violent, cooperative people, (the majority of society) dislike unfair and violent reproducers because these reproducers are a threat to the majority's own reproductive success.
One Gnostic concept (that some view as very blackpilled) is that the physical world is inherently evil, while the abstract world is inherently good.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_of_the_Good</ref> Since our brains exist in the physical world, but our mind in the abstract, the situation may be that we misapply concepts that should only apply in the abstract world onto the physical.
For example, the just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the belief that people's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences. With all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis</ref>
This may be true in the abstract, good, ideal world, but this is definitely not true in the physical, evil, real world.


== See Also ==
== See Also ==
William
Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837

edits

Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/48012"

Navigation menu