Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Essay:Why do incels complain now?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→the increase of misandry
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Incels became more vocal because of | Incels became more vocal because of | ||
===the increase of [[misandry]]=== | ===the increase of [[misandry]]=== | ||
This is arguably seen most vividly during the 4th-wave feminist movement during the Obama years, when [[misandry]] was proclaimed to be mainstream. During the previous waves, it was not necessarily mainstream. Inceldom also experienced it's greatest uptick during this general time. | |||
===The commodification of sex=== | ===The commodification of sex=== | ||
Sex IS commodified, it's not about incels misframing it. This happened as soon as agriculture was invented and men started hoarding the means of production) Before, if you were a sexual loser, you were because you got wrestled and killed to death, not because you didn't amass resources. | Sex IS commodified, it's not about incels misframing it. This happened as soon as agriculture was invented and men started hoarding the means of production) Before, if you were a sexual loser, you were because you got wrestled and killed to death, not because you didn't amass resources. | ||
===The theoretical availability of safer sex.=== | ===The theoretical availability of safer sex.=== | ||
In past civilization, sex was very dangerous and you wouldn't really want to engage in it if you didn't want to spread your genes. Now theoretically it's not dangerous, so there should in theory be no safety reason for barrier-of-access, making it in theory seem like something that doesn't need to be guarded. | In past civilization, sex was very dangerous and you wouldn't really want to engage in it if you didn't want to spread your genes. Now theoretically it's not dangerous, so there should in theory be no safety reason for barrier-of-access, making it in theory seem like something that doesn't need to be guarded. | ||