Charles Fourier: Difference between revisions

A [[blackpill]] female commentator on Fourier named Amia Srinivasan insists that paraphrased "[[itsOVER]] for incels", and says it would be impossible to find someone for everyone.  And then sort of praising sex as mysterious.  Sort of a combination of an ill-informed, unsourced assertion and a reification of discrimination.<ref>https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n06/amia-srinivasan/does-anyone-have-the-right-to-sex</ref>

Charles had a view that people were naturally cooperative and suited to work without markets. And the job of society was to eliminate markets, punish trade-oriented people in society (Jews in his mind),<ref>Roberts, Richard H. (1995). Religion and the Transformations of Capitalism: Comparative Approaches. Routledge. p. 90</ref> establish a code or honor, and simply help people find their needs and niches. He felt this would more or less entitle everyone to jobs and sex as he felt enough non-Jews would see that as honorable.