Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Charles Fourier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Fourier vs. Undersky vs. Houellebecq
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Fourier vs. | ==Fourier vs. others== | ||
Fourier was fairly unique among socialists as he articulated sexual inequality as a large causative factor of various social ills,<ref>The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier, 1983, pg 339</ref> instead of solely focusing his critiques on alienation and economic exploitation, thus preceding [[Michel Clouscard]] and the main character of Michel Houellebecq's novel ''[[Whatever]]'', in his analysis of sexual deprivation from a leftist perspective. Like [[Alex Undersky|Undersky]], and unlike the much less libertarian [[Michel Houellebecq]], Fourier portrays sexual liberalism as inherently good for incels. Although, only without markets in general and under certain other circumstances. His sex specific writings were not widely known during his lifetime, and were rediscovered in the 1960s.<ref>Beecher, J. Bienvenu, R. 1971. ''The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier. pp 329.''</ref> | Fourier was fairly unique among socialists as he articulated sexual inequality as a large causative factor of various social ills,<ref>The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier, 1983, pg 339</ref> instead of solely focusing his critiques on alienation and economic exploitation, thus preceding [[Michel Clouscard]] and the main character of Michel Houellebecq's novel ''[[Whatever]]'', in his analysis of sexual deprivation from a leftist perspective. Like [[Alex Undersky|Undersky]], and unlike the much less libertarian [[Michel Houellebecq]], Fourier portrays sexual liberalism as inherently good for incels. Although, only without markets in general and under certain other circumstances. His sex specific writings were not widely known during his lifetime, and were rediscovered in the 1960s.<ref>Beecher, J. Bienvenu, R. 1971. ''The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier. pp 329.''</ref> | ||