Charles Fourier: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
==Fourier vs. Undersky vs. Houellebecq==
==Fourier vs. Undersky vs. Houellebecq==


He was fairly unique among socialists as he saw sexual inequality to be a large causative factor of various social ills,<ref>The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier, 1983, pg 339</ref> instead of solely focusing his critiques on alienation and economic exploitation, thus preceding [[Michel Clouscard]] and the main character of Michel Houellebecq's novel ''[[Whatever]]'', in his analysis of sexual deprivation from a leftist perspective.  Like [[Alex Undersky|Undersky]], and unlike the much less libertarian [[Michel Houellebecq]], Fourier portrays sexual liberalism as inherently good for incels.  Although, only without markets in general and under certain other circumstances.  His sex specific writings were not widely known during his lifetime, and were rediscovered in the 1960s.<ref>Beecher, J. Bienvenu, R. 1971. ''The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier. pp 329.''</ref>
Fourier was fairly unique among socialists as he saw sexual inequality to be a large causative factor of various social ills,<ref>The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier, 1983, pg 339</ref> instead of solely focusing his critiques on alienation and economic exploitation, thus preceding [[Michel Clouscard]] and the main character of Michel Houellebecq's novel ''[[Whatever]]'', in his analysis of sexual deprivation from a leftist perspective.  Like [[Alex Undersky|Undersky]], and unlike the much less libertarian [[Michel Houellebecq]], Fourier portrays sexual liberalism as inherently good for incels.  Although, only without markets in general and under certain other circumstances.  His sex specific writings were not widely known during his lifetime, and were rediscovered in the 1960s.<ref>Beecher, J. Bienvenu, R. 1971. ''The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier. pp 329.''</ref>


==The Phalanx==
==The Phalanx==
25,837

edits

Navigation menu