Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Charles Fourier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
A [[blackpill]] female commentator on Fourier named Amia Srinivasan insists that paraphrased "[[itsOVER]] for incels", and says it would be impossible to find someone for everyone. And then sort of praising sex as mysterious. Sort of a combination of an ill-informed, unsourced assertion and a reification of discrimination.<ref>https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n06/amia-srinivasan/does-anyone-have-the-right-to-sex</ref> | A [[blackpill]] female commentator on Fourier named Amia Srinivasan insists that paraphrased "[[itsOVER]] for incels", and says it would be impossible to find someone for everyone. And then sort of praising sex as mysterious. Sort of a combination of an ill-informed, unsourced assertion and a reification of discrimination.<ref>https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v40/n06/amia-srinivasan/does-anyone-have-the-right-to-sex</ref> | ||
==Quotes== | |||
{{Quote|"Oblivious of their obligation to provide a minimum of subsistence, the law-makers are even less willing to grant a minimum of sexual gratification. They suppose that the sexual needs are less urgent than the need for food. This is an error. Even though a person can do without sexual intercourse but not without food, it is certain that the need for tactile or sensual pleasures causes as many social disorders as does the need for subsistence."|--Fourier}} | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||