Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
113 bytes added ,  31 January 2020
Line 275: Line 275:
'''Equal pay''': Blackpillers believe admitting women a substantial income was a huge mistake, especially in combination with current economic stagnation. In the past, women's choosiness was naturally counterbalanced by their [[Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men|material dependence on men]]. Removing this dependence, renders men useless and reduces them to their looks<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-017-0963-z</ref> and "social skills" such as superficial posturing, brashness and obnoxiousness ([[clown world]]), departing from traditional masculine traits like being taciturn, quietly confident.
'''Equal pay''': Blackpillers believe admitting women a substantial income was a huge mistake, especially in combination with current economic stagnation. In the past, women's choosiness was naturally counterbalanced by their [[Scientific Blackpill (Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men|material dependence on men]]. Removing this dependence, renders men useless and reduces them to their looks<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-017-0963-z</ref> and "social skills" such as superficial posturing, brashness and obnoxiousness ([[clown world]]), departing from traditional masculine traits like being taciturn, quietly confident.
</li><li>
</li><li>
'''Matching hypothesis is mostly false''': The matching hypothesis states that people naturally prefer potential partners who are about as attractive as themselves. However, the Walster's famous computer dating study suggested otherwise, namely that only the looks of the potential partner predicts romantic interest, not how similar they are in looks.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8jqzp5/explaining_looksmatchism_among_the_average_most/</ref> Data from online dating suggests that men and women alike aim a bit higher than their own desirability, with few aiming excessively high.<ref>https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/4/8/eaap9815.full.pdf</ref> This may imply that without enforced monogamy, both men and women will lack pressure to settle for the "art of the possible," thus people remain single.
'''Matching hypothesis is mostly false''': The matching hypothesis states that people naturally prefer potential partners who are about as attractive as themselves. However, the Walster's famous computer dating study suggested otherwise, namely that only the looks of the potential partner predicts romantic interest, not how similar they are in looks.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8jqzp5/explaining_looksmatchism_among_the_average_most/</ref> Data from online dating suggests that men and women alike aim a bit higher than their own desirability, with few aiming excessively high.<ref>https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/4/8/eaap9815.full.pdf</ref> This may imply that without enforced monogamy, both men and women will lack pressure to settle for the "art of the possible," thus people remain single. This may be evidence of [[Fisherian runaway|exaggerated preferences]] for ornament negatively affecting fitness.
</li><li>
</li><li>
'''Greedy parents''': Affirmative action incentivizes parents to push their female offspring into careers and to be pro-feminist. This forms a self-reinforcing vicious cycle as strengthened feminist policies only increase this incentive.
'''Greedy parents''': Affirmative action incentivizes parents to push their female offspring into careers and to be pro-feminist. This forms a self-reinforcing vicious cycle as strengthened feminist policies only increase this incentive.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu