2,359
edits
Game: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Scientific social status maxxing
(Based on the results of the study, psychopaths most likely social status max better than any1 fucking scary) |
|||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
== Scientific social status maxxing == | == Scientific social status maxxing == | ||
=== Social media === | |||
A study on the relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook found that a higher friend count improved social status of the profile owner. Not only that, participants who saw attractive friends’ photos rated the profile owner significantly more physically attractive (M = 3.65, SD = 1.17, N = 183) than did those exposed to unattractive photos (M = 3.30, SD = 1.17, N = 160). This finding confirms an assimilation effect: profile owners’ attractiveness varied in the same direction as their friends’ did. | A study on the relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook found that a higher friend count improved social status of the profile owner. Not only that, participants who saw attractive friends’ photos rated the profile owner significantly more physically attractive (M = 3.65, SD = 1.17, N = 183) than did those exposed to unattractive photos (M = 3.30, SD = 1.17, N = 160). This finding confirms an assimilation effect: profile owners’ attractiveness varied in the same direction as their friends’ did. | ||
| Line 137: | Line 139: | ||
''An unanticipated interaction effect involving the sex of the profile owner and the nature of the wall statements was obtained with respect to the effect of friends’ Facebook Friends and Individual Evaluations J. B. Walther et al. 44 Human Communication Research 34 (2008) 28–49 ª 2008 International Communication Association comments on perceptions of the targets’ physical attractiveness. The negative statements depicted normatively undesirable behavior, as they involved sexual innuendo and insinuated that the target person was drinking excessively the previous night. These statements raised the desirability of a man’s appearance among the subject population in this study, whereas the residues of such behavior rendered the target physically unattractive when she is female.''<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227674008_The_Role_of_Friends'_Appearance_and_Behavior_on_Evaluations_of_Individuals_on_Facebook_Are_We_Known_by_the_Company_We_Keep</ref> | ''An unanticipated interaction effect involving the sex of the profile owner and the nature of the wall statements was obtained with respect to the effect of friends’ Facebook Friends and Individual Evaluations J. B. Walther et al. 44 Human Communication Research 34 (2008) 28–49 ª 2008 International Communication Association comments on perceptions of the targets’ physical attractiveness. The negative statements depicted normatively undesirable behavior, as they involved sexual innuendo and insinuated that the target person was drinking excessively the previous night. These statements raised the desirability of a man’s appearance among the subject population in this study, whereas the residues of such behavior rendered the target physically unattractive when she is female.''<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227674008_The_Role_of_Friends'_Appearance_and_Behavior_on_Evaluations_of_Individuals_on_Facebook_Are_We_Known_by_the_Company_We_Keep</ref> | ||
Based on the studies results, the best way to | Based on the studies results, the best way to objectively, increase social status (no faking) is unfriend, as many objectively physically unattractive friends as possible, and then add as many objectively physically attractive friends as possible. Post-anti social pictures and content, and delete any negative comments people have to say, but keep the positive. | ||
== How psychopaths run game == | == How psychopaths run game == | ||