Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Creepiness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Contrary to mainstream [[virtue signaling]], '''creepiness''' actually refers to [[beauty|ugly]] appearance and behavior. | Contrary to mainstream [[virtue signaling]], '''creepiness''' actually refers to [[beauty|ugly]] appearance and behavior. | ||
Quite often, [[Foid|women]] will call an unwanted sexual advance creepy even though they mean ''ugly''. Calling the man creepy is a sneaky way of blaming | Quite often, [[Foid|women]] will call an unwanted sexual advance creepy even though they mean ''ugly''. Calling the man creepy is a sneaky way of blaming him for behavior he could correct, when in fact it is entirely about his looks. The term "creepy" is hence intentionally ambiguous. Women know that if they were being completely honest and said "ugly, short guys should eat dust", they would be viewed unfavorably and shallow. Therefore, in order to blameshift, or to covertly act like a chameleon and having a constantly moving goal-post with regards to their moral compass, an ambiguous term such as "creepy" is a welcome adjective in the chameleon's vocabulary. | ||
Interestingly, uggos are not more criminal to meaningful extent,<ref>https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019</ref> so the [[halo effect]] heavily misleads people into thinking creepy people are more criminal. | Interestingly, uggos are not more criminal to meaningful extent,<ref>https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019</ref> so the [[halo effect]] heavily misleads people into thinking creepy people are more criminal. | ||