Incel: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
43 bytes removed ,  23 January 2020
Line 12: Line 12:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


The [[Donnelly Study]] defined incels as adults who fail to find a sexual partner for six months or more without choosing so.
The Donnelly Study defined incels as adults who fail to find a sexual partner for six months or more without choosing so.
There remains disagreement about whether this definition is appropriate due to conceivable loopholes. For example, [[Bluepill|Bluepillers]] often argue in bad faith about such definitions and say male incels could simply have gay sex or pay for a prostitute and, therefore, they are [[volcel|volcels]] and incels don't exist. Hence, a definition in good faith would include an addition that incels are adults who are overwhelmingly rejected by the ''members of the sex they are sexually attracted to''.
There remains disagreement about whether this definition is appropriate due to conceivable loopholes. For example, [[Bluepill|Bluepillers]] often argue in bad faith about such definitions and say male incels could simply have gay sex or pay for a prostitute and, therefore, they are [[volcel|volcels]] and incels don't exist. Hence, a definition in good faith would include an addition that incels are adults who are overwhelmingly rejected by the ''members of the sex they are sexually attracted to''.


There is [[gatekeeping]] and infighting going on in incel forums about who counts as incel.
There is [[gatekeeping]] and infighting going on in incel forums about who counts as incel.
[[Uglycel]]s complain that [[love-shy]]s simply lack ''will'' to find a partner.
[[Uglycel]]s complain that [[love-shy]]s and [[standardcel]]s simply lack ''will'' to find a partner.
In an effort to weed out [[standardcel]]s, many incel forums reject incels who are not willfully trying to date a wide variety of people, or may even say they are not incels.
In an effort to weed out standardcels, some incel forums reject incels who have not seriously and repeatedly attempted dating.
In doing so, they often inandervatently marginalize non-standardcel mentalcels in the process.
In doing so, however, they inandervatently marginalize non-standardcel mentalcels.
This is the source of a lot of conflict in the [[incelosphere]].  A solution to this longstanding conflict would be an incel definition that rejects [[standardcel]]s but includes non-[[standardcel]] [[mentalcel]]s as incel. This has been formalized before, but has not been popularized or adopted yet by any major forum, perhaps because such a definition would be very long.
This is the source of a lot of conflict in the [[incelosphere]].  A solution to this longstanding conflict would be an incel definition that rejects [[standardcel]]s but includes non-[[standardcel]] [[mentalcel]]s as incel. This has been formalized before, but has not been popularized or adopted yet by any major forum, perhaps because such a definition would be very long.


17,538

edits

Navigation menu