Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scientific Blackpill (edit)

Revision as of 07:00, 13 January 2020

280 bytes removed ,  13 January 2020
→‎It is normal for healthy men to find pubescent & prepubescent females sexually arousing
Line 3,264: Line 3,264:
{{quote|There should be strong selection on males to control females' reproduction through direct coercive control of females […]. Evolutionary thinkers, whether informed by feminist ideas or not, are not surprised by one of the overwhelming facts of patriarchal cultures, namely that men […] seek to constrain and control the reproductive capacities of women […]. Juvenilization decreases the threat some men may feel when confronted with women; many men are comfortable around women whom they can clearly dominate and are profoundly uncomfortable around women whom they cannot so clearly dominate.}}
{{quote|There should be strong selection on males to control females' reproduction through direct coercive control of females […]. Evolutionary thinkers, whether informed by feminist ideas or not, are not surprised by one of the overwhelming facts of patriarchal cultures, namely that men […] seek to constrain and control the reproductive capacities of women […]. Juvenilization decreases the threat some men may feel when confronted with women; many men are comfortable around women whom they can clearly dominate and are profoundly uncomfortable around women whom they cannot so clearly dominate.}}


There is substantial evidence that the default human reaction to traumatic experiences is [[antifragility|resilience]], even in cases such as child sexual abuse. Rind et al. (1998) could find no evidence for major adjustment issues in college students who had been subject to child sexual abuse. Heather et al. (2005) reexamined these results and confirmed that, "child sexual abuse accounted for only 1% of the variance in later psychological adjustment, whereas family environment accounted for 5.9% of the variance".
Related to this, there is substantial evidence that humans typically respond with [[antifragility|resilience]] to "potentially traumatic events" such as child sexual abuse. Rind et al. (1998) could find no evidence for major adjustment issues in college students who had been subject to child sexual abuse. Heather et al. (2005) reexamined these results and confirmed that, "child sexual abuse accounted for only 1% of the variance in later psychological adjustment, whereas family environment accounted for 5.9% of the variance".
These findings suggest that the harm inflicted by child sexual abuse has been overstated.


These findings of these studies suggest the harm suffered by victims of child sexual abuse may be strongly overstated, and some have actually argued that it is possible that societal expectations of severe and irreparable harm being habitually caused by these acts may actually serve to hamper the recovery of victims of these acts.
By summarizing this science, this wiki is not excusing actual harm caused by violent abuse, or encouraging the commission of such acts.
 
By summarizing this science, this wiki is not excusing the harm that is done to those who have experienced sexual abuse, or encouraging the commission of any illegal or immoral acts.


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span>
Bibipi
Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538

edits

Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/44544"

Navigation menu