Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions

Talk:Demand side sexual economics (edit)

No change in size , 6 January 2020

25,837

edits

Revision as of 16:22, 6 January 2020 (edit) William (talk \| contribs) (→‎Shaming regulates availability, not demand.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 16:23, 6 January 2020 (edit) (undo) William (talk \| contribs) (→‎Shaming regulates availability, not demand.)
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:: When you include women=vendors this could link to Briffault's law and the notion of gatekeepers. [[User:Bibipi\|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi\|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)		:: When you include women=vendors this could link to Briffault's law and the notion of gatekeepers. [[User:Bibipi\|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi\|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
	:::"tax breaks for unemployed and single men, enabling them to accumulate more money and thus increase SMV, which would arguably be demand side", yes that would be demand-side, I previously mistook that for ~~demand~~ side by not thinking it through enough, will add that back if that was there before[[User:William\|William]] ([[User talk:William\|talk]]) 16:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)		:::"tax breaks for unemployed and single men, enabling them to accumulate more money and thus increase SMV, which would arguably be demand side", yes that would be demand-side, I previously mistook that for supply side by not thinking it through enough, will add that back if that was there before[[User:William\|William]] ([[User talk:William\|talk]]) 16:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)