Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:Also, with regards to the blackpill article, which is something I think you are hinting at. Enforced monogamy is something like sex socialism, but only within families, and only for certain people. It doesn't really fit any market economic model. I labeled it supply side because it reduces the supply of women. But it also regulates demand. But given 'enforced monogamy' is both vague and not much about markets, I should probably delink supply-side economics from the blackpill article. My bad.([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | :Also, with regards to the blackpill article, which is something I think you are hinting at. Enforced monogamy is something like sex socialism, but only within families, and only for certain people. It doesn't really fit any market economic model. I labeled it supply side because it reduces the supply of women. But it also regulates demand. But given 'enforced monogamy' is both vague and not much about markets, I should probably delink supply-side economics from the blackpill article. My bad.([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah I couldn't quite wrap my head around it. I'm sure one can re-frame nearly everything in terms of economics, but it does not seem straight forward | :: Yeah I couldn't quite wrap my head around it. I'm sure one can re-frame nearly everything in terms of economics, but it does not seem straight forward to assign it to either demand or supply, as enforcing monogamy seems to involve both supply and demand side changes. Enforced monogamy is also a spectrum between full sexual communism where everyone is guaranteed a match by law (often used as strawman), vs. simply moderation of promiscuity, encouragement of (earlier) marriage etc. Most of the time people mean the latter, I guess, which is basically "encouraged monogamy" rather than "forced". [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Regarding tax reduction, I agree it is rather supply side, but I was thinking of e.g. tax breaks for unemployed and single men, enabling them to accumulate more money and thus increase SMV, which would arguably be demand side. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | :: Regarding tax reduction, I agree it is rather supply side, but I was thinking of e.g. tax breaks for unemployed and single men, enabling them to accumulate more money and thus increase SMV, which would arguably be demand side. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: When you include women=vendors this could link to Briffault's law and the notion of gatekeepers. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | :: When you include women=vendors this could link to Briffault's law and the notion of gatekeepers. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:30, 6 January 2020 (UTC) | ||