Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
If one does not regard women as vendors, then supply and demand seem the same in the sexual market because both can sell sex then (different from real economics in which the buyers are mostly the mass consumers and the sellers some companies producing products and services). So I think one needs to make this distinction women=vendors. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
If one does not regard women as vendors, then supply and demand seem the same in the sexual market because both can sell sex then (different from real economics in which the buyers are mostly the mass consumers and the sellers some companies producing products and services). So I think one needs to make this distinction women=vendors. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 01:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


:I agree with your first two paragraphs there.  Women are the vendors, unless they start desiring men like men desire women. Also, Enforced monogamy is something like sex socialism, but only for certain people.  It doesn't really fit any market economic model.  I labeled it supply side because it reduces the supply of women.  But it also regulates demand. But given 'enforced monogamy' is both vague and not much about markets, I should probably delink supply-side economics from the blackpill article.  My bad.([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
:I agree with your first two paragraphs there, and it's good for you to make that clarification.  Women are the vendors, unless they start desiring men like men desire women. I need to focus on women=vendors for the economics articles, which I was previously not good at prioritizing.
 
Also, with regards to the blackpill article, which is something I think you are hinting at. Enforced monogamy is something like sex socialism, but only for certain people.  It doesn't really fit any market economic model.  I labeled it supply side because it reduces the supply of women.  But it also regulates demand. But given 'enforced monogamy' is both vague and not much about markets, I should probably delink supply-side economics from the blackpill article.  My bad.([[User talk:William|talk]]) 01:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
25,837

edits

Navigation menu