Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
For example, North Korea heavily shames watching foreign films. This does not decrease the ''demand'' for foreign films, it only manipulates people who are demanding it to do it less openly so as to reduce the influx of film coming in. | For example, North Korea heavily shames watching foreign films. This does not decrease the ''demand'' for foreign films, it only manipulates people who are demanding it to do it less openly so as to reduce the influx of film coming in. | ||
To better explain, we can look at economics. Providing incentives or disincentives for behaviour, rather than directly stimulating it through brainwashing or purchasing power is about increasing production, not demand. In the case of supply-side-theory, this is through regulating taxes | To better explain, we can look at the economics this is based off. Providing incentives or disincentives for behaviour, rather than directly stimulating it through brainwashing or purchasing power is about increasing production, not demand. In the case of supply-side-theory, this is through regulating taxes | ||
{{Quote|Supply-side theorists [NOT DEMAND SIDE THEORISTS] historically have focused on [...] Lower income tax rates [...] higher levels of production, and increased production capacity.|investopedia<ref>https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/supply-sidetheory.asp</ref>}}[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 18:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC) | {{Quote|Supply-side theorists [NOT DEMAND SIDE THEORISTS] historically have focused on [...] Lower income tax rates [...] higher levels of production, and increased production capacity.|investopedia<ref>https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/supply-sidetheory.asp</ref>}}[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 18:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC) | ||