Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Demand side sexual economics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Shaming indirectly increases demand, and is | ==Shaming indirectly increases demand, and the goal is regulating of availability of supply, through what is allowed in the open. And providing incentives for sex is about sexual sublimination, not demand== | ||
Shaming says "This is not for you". It doesn't decrease the amount someone will look for something. You are trying to psychologically manipulate someone from transferring demand to actual success in the opoen, it does't actually decrease demand, and certainly not desire. If I tell someone they are going to be punished for wanting sex and so they have less sex, it's not because they want it less it's because they are told they will be punished ''if they have it''. IE it's regulating the ''availability'' of sex, see [[supply side sexual economics]]. | Shaming says "This is not for you". It doesn't decrease the amount someone will look for something. You are trying to psychologically manipulate someone from transferring demand to actual success in the opoen, it does't actually decrease demand, and certainly not desire. If I tell someone they are going to be punished for wanting sex and so they have less sex, it's not because they want it less it's because they are told they will be punished ''if they have it''. IE it's regulating the ''availability'' of sex, see [[supply side sexual economics]]. | ||