6,480
edits
Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→References should always go to the DOI
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
: Excellent idea, but it would require a bit of work. Will hopefully be done eventually. Was originally going to suggest this myself, but forgot. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 19:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | : Excellent idea, but it would require a bit of work. Will hopefully be done eventually. Was originally going to suggest this myself, but forgot. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 19:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:: Unfortunately it's not straight forward to convert URLs to DOIs: https://www.crossref.org/blog/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship/ But I do not think this is a huge issue as it is unlikely for these URLs to become invalid anytime soon and if they do they can easily be retrieved by authors, year and title. More worried about our sloppy refs elsewhere in the Wiki where we only cite URLs. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 22:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | :: Unfortunately it's not straight forward to convert URLs to DOIs: https://www.crossref.org/blog/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship/ But I do not think this is a huge issue as it is unlikely for these URLs to become invalid anytime soon and if they do they can easily be retrieved by authors, year and title. More worried about our sloppy refs elsewhere in the Wiki where we only cite URLs. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 22:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:: Would also be a good idea to start replacing links to key non peer-reviewed news article and the like with archived links. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 23:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC) | |||