Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→References should always go to the DOI
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
: Excellent idea, but it would require a bit of work. Will hopefully be done eventually. Was originally going to suggest this myself, but forgot. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 19:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | : Excellent idea, but it would require a bit of work. Will hopefully be done eventually. Was originally going to suggest this myself, but forgot. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 19:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:: Unfortunately it's not straight forward to convert URLs to DOIs: https://www.crossref.org/blog/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship/ But I do not think this is a huge issue as it is unlikely for these URLs to become invalid anytime soon and if they do they can easily be retrieved by authors, year and title. More worried about our sloppy refs elsewhere in the Wiki where we only cite URLs. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 22:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | :: Unfortunately it's not straight forward to convert URLs to DOIs: https://www.crossref.org/blog/urls-and-dois-a-complicated-relationship/ But I do not think this is a huge issue as it is unlikely for these URLs to become invalid anytime soon and if they do they can easily be retrieved by authors, year and title. More worried about our sloppy refs elsewhere in the Wiki where we only cite URLs or PDF links. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 22:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC) | ||