159
edits
Talk:Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→References should always go to the DOI: new section
(→References should always go to the DOI: new section) |
|||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
[https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men_like_61.9.25_of_female_profiles.2C_women_like_only_4.5.25_of_male_profiles "Overall, men liked or superliked 61.9% of their female profiles. On the other hand, women only liked 4.5% of the male profiles, a sex ratio that is fairly close to the sex ratio in agreement to unsolicited invitations to sex in non-online naturalistic settings (e.g. Clark & Hatfield 1989, Tappé 2013, Maticka-Tyndale 2010)."] Tappé was not a naturalistic setting, and it had many different results. Also where in Maticka does it show that? I can't find the full text, but no summary mentions findings like Hatfield and Clark. Hatfield and Clark was 75% men-agreed,0% women-agreed for sex-only (you used apartment-asking stats, not sex-only stats), also Tappé was nowhere near the Hatfield study and also nowhere near 61%-male agreement in any of the three studies in Tappé. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC) | [https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Men_like_61.9.25_of_female_profiles.2C_women_like_only_4.5.25_of_male_profiles "Overall, men liked or superliked 61.9% of their female profiles. On the other hand, women only liked 4.5% of the male profiles, a sex ratio that is fairly close to the sex ratio in agreement to unsolicited invitations to sex in non-online naturalistic settings (e.g. Clark & Hatfield 1989, Tappé 2013, Maticka-Tyndale 2010)."] Tappé was not a naturalistic setting, and it had many different results. Also where in Maticka does it show that? I can't find the full text, but no summary mentions findings like Hatfield and Clark. Hatfield and Clark was 75% men-agreed,0% women-agreed for sex-only (you used apartment-asking stats, not sex-only stats), also Tappé was nowhere near the Hatfield study and also nowhere near 61%-male agreement in any of the three studies in Tappé. [[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 12:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
tld;dr Tappé results are 25% men agreed, hatfield and clarke are 75% men agreed, cannot find maticka results yet[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC) | tld;dr Tappé results are 25% men agreed, hatfield and clarke are 75% men agreed, cannot find maticka results yet[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 13:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
== References should always go to the DOI == | |||
DOI is a permalink, while magazines / journals / other media may shut down. DOI is the professional way to reference, and is updated so it always resolves. | |||
Example: | |||
- 'Very unattractive' women are more likely to be married than other women | |||
Reference goes to: | |||
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X17302204?via%3Dihub | |||
DOI is linked in that same page, it's: | |||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2018.03.003 | |||