Women in STEM: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  26 December 2019
Line 31: Line 31:
While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to men than not, when controlling for time.  Indeed, according to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.  So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount, however it isn't known who exactly benefits.
While it may be corrupting to the [[STEM]] fields, having co-ed classes seems to be statistically more beneficial to men than not, when controlling for time.  Indeed, according to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.  So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners, just by a very small amount, however it isn't known who exactly benefits.


A similar study by Ivy Wong demonstrated that student from single-sex classes report more anxiety around the opposite gender than students from co-ed classes.<ref>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208707</ref>
A similar study by Ivy Wong demonstrated that students from single-sex classes report more anxiety around the opposite gender than students from co-ed classes.<ref>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208707</ref>


According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).
According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).
25,837

edits

Navigation menu