Talk:Physiognomy: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Physiognomy (edit)

Revision as of 02:18, 26 December 2019

1,093 bytes removed , 26 December 2019

no edit summary

Mikey

Automoderated users

2,359

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Proposing this section be removed, unless mikey can provide actual sources or far sounder arguments in regards to evil women being supposedly better looking. Perhaps the videos could be re-incorporated in a section about low-trust/evil looking faces?
+== Study collecting ==
-== Pure evil couple archetype ==
-This pure evil couple tends to put the [[Hybristophilia|amygdala region of the brain on high alert.]] They are described, as evil, rotten, low down, dirty, and sleezy. To some people the man pictured on the left, looks to be neutral (no amygdala response), however everyone views the woman on the right to be some type of seductively attractive [[witch]]. This suggests that among women (but not men) an evil personality may be intrinsically correlated with [[witch|slight facial deformities]] on an otherwise attractive face.
-{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SroGl_yZMBw|frame|}}
 [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 23:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
@@ Line 32: / Line 28: @@
 The general gist is psychopaths (evil people) are better at mimicking (hiding) their true emotions which may be why in our
 Physiognomy experiments they are harder to read. With of course males being much more psychopathic than females. [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 02:18, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
-== Revamped ==
-What do u guys think know? [[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 01:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
-: Looks good, nice work. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 01:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)"

Talk:Physiognomy: Difference between revisions

Talk:Physiognomy (edit)

Revision as of 02:18, 26 December 2019

Navigation menu

Search