Women in STEM: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
235 bytes removed ,  25 December 2019
Line 25: Line 25:
<br>
<br>


== Do women in STEM increase or decrease STEMcel rates? ==
== Controversy over women in STEM ==
A female entry into STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, it is not entirely clear how much it affects the prevalence of inceldom. Theoretically, the greater prevalence of the opposite sex should imply more opportunities for finding a partner.
A female entry into STEM spaces, while it may be corrupting to the STEM field, it is not entirely clear how much it affects the prevalence of inceldom. Theoretically, the greater prevalence of the opposite sex should imply more opportunities for finding a partner.
Indeed, acording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.
Indeed, acording to a study by Ivy [[penis|Wong]], students in single-sex classes report later onset of dating experience and fewer dating partners than members of co-ed classes,<ref>https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1187-6</ref> however the effect sizes were small (d = .2) and in most other measures of sexual activity there were no significant effects.  So in other words, yes having co-ed classes means more dates and partners according to that study.
According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).
According to the [[Donnelly Study]], some incels report gender segregation at work and lack of exposure to females in general as a cause of their celibacy, especially among male incels.<ref>http://cda.morris.umn.edu/~meeklesr/celibacy.html</ref>  A study of Redditors found lack of exposure to the opposite gender as the ~9th most common cause of their singledom and 4.70% of all responses (see [[causes of inceldom]]).


Line 33: Line 33:
Today, as many as 28% of men avoid one-on-one meetings with female work collegues.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#27.25_of_men_report_avoiding_one-on-one_meetings_with_female_work_colleagues</ref>
Today, as many as 28% of men avoid one-on-one meetings with female work collegues.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#27.25_of_men_report_avoiding_one-on-one_meetings_with_female_work_colleagues</ref>
Many workplaces actively discourage romances.
Many workplaces actively discourage romances.
Also even though sex-segregation has increased, incel rates are also at all-time high (see [[demographics]]).
Also, even though sex-segregation has decreased, incel rates are also at all-time high (see [[demographics]]). This is mostly explainable by less men going to college and women being more picky, as there is no study that shows being closer to the opposite gender hinders your ability with women.
[[Jordan Peterson]] has also mentioned an anecdote in which only few male university students got to have sexual relationships despite a surplus of female students.<ref>https://youtube.com/watch?v=jsMqSBB3ZTY?t=293</ref> In some incel forums, men lamented that they have many female coworkers, but are ignored by them.<ref>http://redditsearch.io/?term=female%20coworkers%20invisible&dataviz=false&aggs=false&subreddits=braincels&searchtype=comments&search=true&start=0&end=1576953976&size=100</ref>


==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
==Women as "pioneers in STEM"==
25,837

edits

Navigation menu