Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 3,451: Line 3,451:
* Buss DM. 1989. ''Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.'' Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
* Buss DM. 1989. ''Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.'' Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
* Buss DM. 1992. ''Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice andintrasexual competition.'' In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), Theadapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249-266).New York: Oxford University Press.
* Buss DM. 1992. ''Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice andintrasexual competition.'' In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), Theadapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249-266).New York: Oxford University Press.
* Buss DM. 1994. ''The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York:Basic Books.
* Buss DM. 1994. ''The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating.'' New York:Basic Books.
* Ellis BJ. 1992. ''The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms inwomen.'' In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), ''The adapted mind:Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture'' (pp. 267-288). New York: Oxford University Press.
* Ellis BJ. 1992. ''The evolution of sexual attraction: Evaluative mechanisms inwomen.'' In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), ''The adapted mind:Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture'' (pp. 267-288). New York: Oxford University Press.
* Hill EM, Nocks ES, Gardner L. 1987. ''Physical attractiveness: Manipulation by physique and status displays.'' Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 143-154.
* Hill EM, Nocks ES, Gardner L. 1987. ''Physical attractiveness: Manipulation by physique and status displays.'' Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 143-154.
17,538

edits

Navigation menu