Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,324 bytes added ,  23 December 2019
No edit summary
Line 3,534: Line 3,534:
While human females appear to exhibit more choice copying all around (Stree 2018), mate choice copying may be an expression of women's disinterest in low status males and interest in high status males which is [[#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status|correlated with men's peer status]], i.e. women may dislike singles because they are more often low status. Since other women choose based on status, the relationship status of a man is a costly and hence accurate indicator of having  already won prior contest competitions.
While human females appear to exhibit more choice copying all around (Stree 2018), mate choice copying may be an expression of women's disinterest in low status males and interest in high status males which is [[#Males_gained_peer_status_through_having_had_sex_and_females_lost_peer_status|correlated with men's peer status]], i.e. women may dislike singles because they are more often low status. Since other women choose based on status, the relationship status of a man is a costly and hence accurate indicator of having  already won prior contest competitions.
All of this (including the preference for high status men) may also simply be an expression of women's more agreeable, subordinating behavior which presumably evolved being physically weaker and more childlike ([[bodyguard hypothesis]]).
All of this (including the preference for high status men) may also simply be an expression of women's more agreeable, subordinating behavior which presumably evolved being physically weaker and more childlike ([[bodyguard hypothesis]]).
Anthropologist Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1989) suggested the tendency for women to submit to dominant men may a remnant of ancient adaptations in which pair formation only succeeds when the male is able to dominate his partner which can be observed in many reptiles, birds, and mammals.
In many species, including humans, the greater [[Bateman's principle|parental investment]] on part of females causes males to engage in [[#Men.27s_social_status_accounts_for_62.25_of_the_variance_of_copulation_opportunities|contest competitions]] over reproductive opportunities.
A result is that the act of penetration itself acts as dominance signal as it is the consequence of winning prior contests, hence it becomes a desirable trait in males that females "surrender" to, and ending up copying the mate choice of other women.
[[Feminism|Feminists]] have interpreted female mate-choice copying to be a pre-test to make sure the male is not dangerous which is a ludicrous and false assertion as women love dangerous men.


<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''90% of single women indicated interest in an already attached male vs 59% who indicated interest in the same male who was stated to be single.''
* ''90% of single women indicated interest in an already attached male vs 59% who indicated interest in the same male who was stated to be single.''
* ''There was no significant effect for men viewing pictures of women.''
* ''There was no significant effect for men viewing pictures of women.''
* ''Single women in this study were significantly more interested in the target when he was attached. This may be because an attached man has demonstrated his ability to commit and in some ways his qualities have already been "pre-screened" by another woman.''
* ''Single women in this study were significantly more interested in the target when he was attached. This may be because an attached man has demonstrated his ability to commit and in some ways his qualities have already been "pre-screened" by another woman.''
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* Parker J, Burkley M. 2009. ''Who’s chasing whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching.'' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45(4): 1016-1019. [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103109001048?via%3Dihub Abstract]]
* Parker J, Burkley M. 2009. ''Who’s chasing whom? The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching.'' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45(4): 1016-1019. [[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103109001048?via%3Dihub Abstract]]
* Street SE, Morgan TJ, Thornton A, Brown GR, Laland KN, Cross CP. 2018. ''Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.'' Scientific reports. 8(1):1715. [[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19770-8 FullText]]
* Street SE, Morgan TJ, Thornton A, Brown GR, Laland KN, Cross CP. 2018. ''Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.'' Scientific reports. 8(1):1715. [[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19770-8 FullText]]
Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. 1989. ''Pair Formation, Courtship, Sexual Love.'' In: ''Human Ethology.'' Rougtledge. [[https://books.google.com/books?id=-CExDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PT6&ots=KctjD7Zprm&dq=Pair%20Formation%2C%20Courtship%2C%20Sexual%20Love&pg=PT335#v=onepage&q=Pair%20Formation,%20Courtship,%20Sexual%20Love&f=false Excerpt]]


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Women_are_prone_to_instability_when_they_are_more_attractive_than_their_male_partner">Women are prone to instability when they are more attractive than their male partner</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Women_are_prone_to_instability_when_they_are_more_attractive_than_their_male_partner">Women are prone to instability when they are more attractive than their male partner</span>===
17,538

edits

Navigation menu