Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Talk:Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Do any meaningful amount of blackpillers propose changing female nature?
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==Do any meaningful amount of blackpillers propose changing female nature?== | ==Do any meaningful amount of blackpillers propose changing female nature?== | ||
I don't see it and it wasn't cited so I got rid of that sentence that claimed it was part of the blackpill. The common theme of the blackpill since the first definition by Paragon is very strong in [[biological essentialism]]. I mean Paragon basically meant the blackpill to mean 'women's sexuality can't be changed in any timeframe shorter than millions of years'. This continues into today, if you went into a modern blackpill space and told blackpillers to join in a movement to make incels more appealing to women, they'd just look at you funny.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 03:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | I don't see it and it wasn't cited so I got rid of that sentence that claimed it was part of the blackpill. The common theme of the blackpill since the first definition by Paragon is very strong in [[biological essentialism]]. I mean Paragon basically meant the blackpill to mean 'women's sexuality can't be changed in any timeframe shorter than millions of years'. This continues into today, if you went into a modern blackpill space and told blackpillers to join in a movement to make incels more appealing to women (decrease cost of childbirth, reduce gender dimorphism, socially engineer eglitarian values etc), they'd just look at you funny.[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 03:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | ||