Talk:Chad: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,360 bytes added ,  19 December 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Try not to not put social media photos or dating app photos as the main image for chad. This is not ED, we do not harass people[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 04:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Try not to not put social media photos or dating app photos as the main image for chad. This is not ED, we do not harass people[[User:William|William]] ([[User talk:William|talk]]) 04:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
== The body guard hypothesis has already been debunked my man ==
Girls are linearly less attracted to extremely tall men. (Every inch above 6ft) Despite the tallest men, being the most status. That is just one instance though of there being a curvilinear relationship with attractiveness and dominance. IE. the most dominant guy is attractive but not the most attractive.
https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#A_man.27s_height_determines_his_dating_pool._Over_94.25_of_women_reject_men_for_being_.22too_short.22
"The most common explanation is foids would want a tall man because they’ll think “he’ll be stronger and better able to ward off physical threats to his family”.[1] Scientific studies on male height and attractiveness have shown this to be completely false.[2] Women are linearly less attracted to the tallest men (every inch above 6ft). Women view the same man at 6ft 6 just as unattractive at 5ft 7. The reason the same guy at 6ft 6 will have more sex, is because the guy at 6ft 6 is and will be perceived to be more dominant, and thus higher status. Status accounts for 62% of the variance of copulation opportunities.[3] Women are most attracted to a height of 6ft because that is the height their brains tell them is most aesthetically pleasing."
[[User:Mikey|Mikey]] ([[User talk:Mikey|talk]]) 16:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Navigation menu